My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN062904
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCMIN062904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:40 AM
Creation date
6/25/2004 3:41:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/29/2004
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN062904
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
includes things such as common dining facility, even though the apartments are for <br />independent living. There will be a common facility for families and social gatherings. <br />There will also be a library, flexible spaces for classrooms, computer room, beauty salon, <br />medical personnel and general meeting spaces. A 1,500 square foot community <br />clubhouse is planned that could be used by the public. The commercial component is <br />planned for quick service businesses such as an ice cream shop or coffee shop. They <br />have met with the neighborhood and found that people were positive towards this project. <br />It creates the lowest impact on the neighborhood. The proposed buildings are 35' tall. <br />The buildings adjacent to the project are 25' - 35' tall. The minimum setback for the <br />project is 15'. <br /> <br />Max Nardoni, representing Klein Financial Corporation, 4030 Palos Verdes Drive, #106, <br />Rolling Hills Estates, California, financial advisors to the project, said as a proposed <br />100% senior housing project, his company is trying to structure and propose multi-family <br />housing tax exempt bonds and tax credit financing for the project. He encouraged the <br />parties participating in the project to move forward as quickly as possible. The interest <br />rates are very low and the project now is a financially feasible project. The demand for <br />tax-exempt bonds at the state level is very competitive. The project is smaller in scale <br />than some previous proposals. This project works from a planning standpoint as well as <br />from a financing standpoint. There is a growing need for senior housing, especially <br />affordable senior housing. There is no impact on the schools with this project. <br />Architecturally it will be the nicest building in the neighborhood. Most of the other <br />buildings were built approximately 10 - 15 years ago. There is generous parking <br />proposed. Allowing the project to proceed on a parallel basis would give flexibility to the <br />City and the developer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brozosky said higconcern is the City has very limited funds left in the in <br />lieu housing fee account, because of commitments already made for assisted living <br />center. The City has heard a lot from the businesses in the community there is a demand <br />for work force housing. Anything the City uses on the senior housing takes money that <br />the City has for work force housing. <br /> <br />Eriene Demarcus, 4542 Mohr Avenue, expressed her concern about the lack of a <br />shopping center in the subject area. The area now has boarded up windows and spaces <br />that are empty, which is an eyesore. She urged Council to expedite the senior project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Campbell returned to the Council Chambers. <br /> <br />Pat Belding, 7703 Highland Oaks Drive, Chairperson representing Citizens for a Caring <br />Community, a community group interested in promoting affordable housing. She stated <br />for some time her group has been encouraging the Council to take action to implement <br />the rezoning of enough properdes to meet its fair share of housing for low and very low <br />income residents of Pleasantnn, as required in the 2003 Housing Element. This would <br />involve planning for 700 housing units, including senior and work force housing. They <br />were happy to see the staff report for the meeting discuss the possible properties for high <br />density residential in Pleasanton. They were disappointed with staff's suggestion that <br /> <br />Minutes of the 7 06.29.04 <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council & Planning Commission <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.