CCMIN061504 - Laserfiche WebLink

7. MATfI~RS INITIATED BY COUNCIL Mr. Campbell requested consideration for requiring new Pleasanton businesses that will generate a significant amount of traffic to pay traffic impact fees. Ms. McKeehan noted that the ordinance was written to address new construction and not necessarily changes in buildings unless it was a major addition. There was no consensus by Council to consider this matter further. Mr. Brozosky requested an agenda item to support the School District in declaring the Granite Asphalt Plant a public nuisance. Ms. Hosterman wondered if the public heating held by the Alameda County Planning Commission should be held first prior to Council discussing this matter. Mr. Brozosky noted that this issue has been ongoing for over a year. He believed that the Alameda Planning Commission's would not push this issue if it did not receive support from the City to terminate the operation of the asphalt plant. Nelson Fialho believed it would be appropriate for staff to draft a staff report concerning the asphalt plant and provide support to the County to remove it. Staff could comment on the context of the quarry site and allow Council to react to it and either approve or not approve a letter that could then be carded forward to the Alameda County Planning Commission. There was Council support to agendize this matter for the July 20 Council meeting. Mr. Brozosky also requested an agenda item to consider placing the uses for the Bemal property on the November 2, 2004 ballot. Ms. Hosterman believed it might be counterproductive as it might be confusing to the public to vote on a list of uses without having a picture of what the uses might look like. Mr. Brozosky envisioned putting the uses for the Bemal property on the ballot and referring to the design competition as examples of what might appear on the property. Ms. Ayala supported Mr. Brozosky's request. Mayor Pico supported looking at what options were available to Council. Pleasanton City Council 33 06/15/04 Minutes