CCMIN032304 - Laserfiche WebLink

Donna Walker, 462 Tioga Court, addressed Council in favor of the proposed expansion of the existing water park facilities. As a resident of the Shadow Cliffs development, she sees the water park as being an asset to the community rather than something that may obstruct her view. She did not believe traffic would be any worse on Stanley Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue than it is currently. She assumed that if the water park brought additional traffic and presented even more of a problem, it could be mitigated. While she understood the concerns of her neighbors regarding patrons of the water slides parking in the surrounding neighborhoods, she did not believe it would be a reality. The few people that currently park in the surrounding neighborhoods are joggers or people walking their dogs. She was concerned about the validity of the petition that was being circulated in opposition to the expansion of the water park based on what she personally was told. She was informed that lights would be on until 10 p.m., speakers would be blaring until 10 p.m., gang related activity would be coming from Oakland, and the property value of her home would go down. Al~er listening to the presentation provided by the Chief of Police related to crime, and based on conversations with several realtors who have assured her that her property values will not go down, she was not convinced that the petition was really valid. James Palmer, 3880 Stratford Court, addressed Council in favor of the expansion of the water park. In reviewing the history related to aquatics in Pleasanton, he discovered that between the 1950's and 1960's, a privately owned pool used to be located on Stanley Boulevard, which was called the Berry Patch. In 1981, Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation area and the water park replaced the Berry Patch. To his knowledge, the water park has been well utilized and has been a good neighbor to the community. The existing water park and its applicant have helped furnish employment, and have helped local groups and charities. The expanded water park will provide an activity for the entire family, with emphasis on children's play structures. He did not believe the water park would be expanded to the degree that it would be termed a "mega" water park. The expansion of the water park will remain in the area that it currently exists, and it would not take over any other real estate. By allowing the expansion of the water park, EBRPD has stated that Shadow Cliffs will operate with a positive cash flow instead of in the negative, as it presently does. The positive cash flow will benefit the taxpayers of this community. He believed that the only days there might be potential traffic delays would be during the three major summer holidays, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, and Labor Day. He hoped Council made a decision this evening or at a subsequent meeting. He did not want this project subject to referendum by the voters. Bruce Torquemada, 3072 Albemi Court, believed that the building of an elementary school would greatly reduce the number of traffic in Pleasanton, and it would also solve the problem of overcrowded classrooms at all of the elementary schools. He also did not believe there were enough activities in Pleasanton for the children. He strongly urged Council to support the expansion of the water slides for all of the children and families in Pleasanton that want an outdoor, recreational facility. Jeff Reynolds, 7489 Aster Court, pointed out that if Council uses the findings that the Planning Commission used to deny the permit, it also must uphold any appeal for any Pleasanton City Council 5 03/23/04 Minutes