CCMIN021704 - Laserfiche WebLink

The public hearing was closed. It was moved by Ms. Ayala, seconded by Mr. Brozosky, to f'md that the modified architectural elevations conform to the direction of the Planning Commission; that no position on nighttime or weekend parking at 325 Ray Street be taken; make a f'mdlng that the project would have a de minimus impact on wildlife; adopt Resolution 04-007 approving the Negative Declaration; adopt Resolution 04- 008 approving Case PSP-5 for an amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan, as shown in Exhibit D; and make a f'mding that the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, and purposes of the PUD ordinance; and introduce Ordinance 1902 approving Case PUD-30 for a rezoning of 325 Ray Street from R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) to PUD-0 (Planned Unit Development-Office) and development plan approval, subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit B. Mr. Campbell asked Ms. Ayala what she meant by taking no position with regard to nighttime or weekend parking at 325 Ray Street? Ms. Ayala concurred with the remarks made by Mr. Siewert and noted that if the applicant is sensitive to the promises it made to the neighbors and has provided parking for its project, she believed it was not necessary to address the parking issue. Mr. Campbell said he supported the entire motion but would like to discuss the parking, as he liked the idea of having an interim period ofg0 days to see how the public parking interacts with the neighborhood. At the end of 90 days, the matter could be brought back to Council for discussion. He believed this would be a good opportunity to provide parking to the public but at the same time, he wanted to be sensitive to the neighbors. Ms. Ayala did not disagree with Mr. Campbell and would have recommended a trial period to allow for public parking in the evenings and on weekends if the applicant was so inclined. She believed the parking issues could be taken care of by remaining silent. Mr. Brozosky asked Ms. Ayala what she meant by staying silent on the parking? Ms. Ayala said that it would be like any other parking spaces in the downtown. Mr. Brozosky asked if the parking would only be for the office use? Ms. Ayala believed the applicant could make the decision as whether it wanted to only allow parking for office use. Ms. Hosterman believed a better way to word Council's action, as it pertained to parking, was that the applicant would provide 51 parking spaces and those 51 spaces would more than take care of its needs on this particular site without placing any Pleasanton City Council 20 02/17/04 Minutes