CCMIN021704 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Hosterman noted that this was her first opportunity to support a new development of this size and scale in the community. She was concerned that some of the more recent buildings were less than what she would have liked to have seen. It appeared to her that this building could be aesthetically pleasing, but it will depend on how the building is actually built out. If Council decided to approve this project, she asked if there would be a fight review process? She was looking for a Stanford Shopping Center rather than a Sun Valley Mall. She asked staffifit believed this project would fit nicely within the rest of the downtown and be an addition aesthetically? Mr. Swift said that staffbelieves this will be an aesthetically pleasing building when it is constructed. Staff was concerned about the Spanish Colonial style architecture that is shown as the general design concept. Staffhas included a list of requirements for this building, which address many details. The City's peer reviewing architect has looked at the building and has made suggestions along those same lines, which have been incorporated into the design of the plans. Therefore, staff is very comfortable that the building itself will include all of the elements, from the wrought iron gates and grill work to the exposed wood timbers, the type of stucco, the type of tile roof, and the deep recesses of the windows, all of which are specified in the conditions. From an architectural standpoint, this site is very difficult because it is in a location where there is a mixture of buildings. As the building faces Ray Street, there are two ends, which will almost appear as if there are two small buildings. He noted that the courtyard sits between the buildings and although they are linked together, it will probably look more like two separate one-story buildings rather than one massive building. Ms. Hosterman wanted to hear from other councilmembers as to how they felt about the second story change. She recognized that high density in the Downtown is a goal that benefits the health of the downtown, but at the same time, she wanted to be sure that Council is protecting the integrity of the surrounding neighborhoods. She noted that there are several places in the staffreport that state that the neighborhood has seen the same square footage that is being proposed, and in other places in the staffreport it indicated that the neighbors have seen a design, which is substantially similar to what is being considered. She wanted the neighbors to be given the opportunity to see what the building will look like to avoid any surpr/ses that might occur after the fact. She asked staff if it could assure her that the neighbors would be shown the same design plans for the office building that Council had been shown this evening? Mr. Swift was not sure what designs the neighbors had seen, but noted that the applicant has taken a number of plans to the neighbors. The plans have evolved from the time they were shown at the neighborhood meeting that staff attended, which was in September of 2003. He noted that the building is slightly different now but has the same square footage. The height has evolved from the first drawing to a taller building, which is a result of where the heating and air conditioning equipment is placed. The neighbors did not want it placed on the roof. He noted that this project has not yet gone through the building plan check process, and usually in this process, a building will change slightly. The neighbors would need to continue to attend the Planning Commission and or City Council meetings to see the plans as they are finally approved, and review the conditions Pleasanton City Council 11 02/17/04 Minutes