|
<br />d. Proposed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for Spatial Datasharing between
<br />the City of Pleasanton, City of Livennore, City of Dublin, Town of Danville, and
<br />the Tri-Valley Business Council. (SR 04:020)
<br />
<br />NOES:
<br />ABSENT:
<br />ABSTAIN:
<br />
<br />The roll call vote was taken as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Brozosky, Campbell, Hosterman, and
<br />Mayor Pico
<br />None
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />5. MEETINGS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
<br />
<br />Kathy Maio, Senior Children's Librarian, recognized the following Newcott-
<br />Caldebery Library Award participants:
<br />
<br />Kamryn Brown, I sl grade, Caldebery Award; Austin Greth, I sl grade, N ewcott
<br />Award; Madison Brinnon, 2nd grade, Caldebery Award; Tiffany Nguyen, 2nd grade,
<br />Newcott Award; Sneha Nagarajan, 3rd .fade, Caldebery Award; Vasan Arul, 3rd grade,
<br />Caldebery Award; Samira Ongchua, 3 grade, Newcott Award; Clive Veer~al, 4th grade,
<br />Caldebery Award; Kim Stephenson, 4th grade, Newcott Award; Ines Kuo, 5 grade,
<br />Caldebery Award; Priyanka Prasad, 5th grade, Newcott Award; Sai Wusirika, 6th grade,
<br />Caldebery A ward; William ligen, 6th grade, Newcott Award; Anthony Da Rochon, 7th
<br />grade, Caldebery Award; Aliya Deri, 7th grade, Newcott Award; David Sin, 8th grade,
<br />Caldebery Award; and Nathan Kobayashi, 8th grade, Newcott Award.
<br />
<br />Other Speakers
<br />
<br />Anne Fox, 2866 Garden Creek Circle, addressed Council regarding traffic issues.
<br />She presented to Council excerpts from the City of Livermore's General Plan related to
<br />cut-through traffic. She also presented a list that was compiled by Caltrans and the
<br />Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which illustrated Bay Area freeway locations
<br />with the most delay during commute hours. She encouraged Council to focus on cut-
<br />through traffic and model the City of Livermore's policies,
<br />
<br />Ms. Ayala noted that following the joint CouncillPlanning Commission workshop
<br />on traffic issues, the Planning Commission was to have continued the discussion at its
<br />meeting the following evening. She asked in what direction the Planning Commission
<br />was going.
<br />
<br />Ms. Fox noted that there was some discussion at the end of the Planning
<br />Commission meeting. She believed staff had recommended that it come up with some
<br />issue reports and recommendations on some of the issues, which would then be presented
<br />to Council and the Planning Commission as to what the alternatives should be for each
<br />issue. Prior to this evening's Council meeting, she mentioned that she had received an
<br />email which indicated that staff was trying to set up a discussion prior to the beginning of
<br />
<br />Pleasanton City Council
<br />Minutes
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />01/20/04
<br />
|