Laserfiche WebLink
She lives by an apartment complex and has been informed by the residents that they <br />would rather live in an affordable ownership unit than an affordable rental unit. She <br />believed that if Council allowed the Slto 34 ownership units to transfer it would set a <br />precedent to other developers, who in the future might want to build more than 15 percent <br />of rental units. She pointed out that this discussion had been held at some of the General <br />Plan meetings, and there was a desire to spread affordable units throughout the City and <br />not concentrate areas of affordable units in certain parts of town. She encouraged <br />Council to support the 51 units and have those units transferable to ownership units. <br /> <br /> Cindy McGovem, 9206 Long View, asked Council to reconsider the idea of the <br />City having a fight to a refusal on the property. She concurred with Mr. Brozosky's <br />comments and mentioned that the Youth Master Plan Committee has been working hard <br />in obtaining a BMX Park in the City. She mentioned there had been some discussion <br />about having a BMX Park located temporarily on the 23-acre site. As the City <br />approaches build out and there is less land available, and the design of the Bemal <br />property is taken into consideration, she did not believe everything would fit on one site. <br />If there is an option available, she believed it would provide the City the opportunity to <br />readdress this matter in the future. She also believed Council owed the residents of <br />Pleasanton the ability to look at this site if and when the School District determines <br />whether it will build on the 23-acre site. She cautioned Council to take into consideration <br />the value of the land because it could be mcaningfuL <br /> <br />There were no further speakers. <br /> <br /> Written communication was presented to Council from Kurt Wiest, 1594 <br />Loganberry Way, Chair of the Housing Commission. He mentioned the Housing <br />Commission had supported the efforts of the developers of the Busch property to enhance <br />the affordability of senior units through the acquisition of tax credits. He also mentioned <br />that both the Housing and Planning Commissions discussed this matter and passed <br />resolutions in support. The Housing Commission, in particular, felt it important that <br />Council retain control, on a case-by-case basis, in granting approval for any txansfer of <br />credits. He believed the approval of the amendment to the Affordable Housing <br />Agreement with Ponderosa Homes was appropriate and would serve to assist in meeting <br />goals specified in the Housing Element. He also mentioned his dismay with regard to the <br />Tri-Valley Herald's poor choice of words in the front page headline of today's <br />newspaper, "Home Too Old For Seniors." He believed the article gave fair <br />representation of the issues relating to the formulation ora task rome. However, he <br />believed the headline gives the clear impression that Kottinger Place is no longer a safe <br />and decent place for seniors to live, which is far from the truth. Management of the <br />complex, as well as City staff, does an excellent job maintaining a high standard of <br />livability at the complex. In its present condition, he believed Kotfinger Place had many <br />years of useful life in front of it. The formulation of the task force is simply to keep in <br />step with Pleasanton's motto, "City of Planned Progress." He believed now is the time to <br />start looking at possible options for maintaining and/or enhancing the viability of <br />Kottinger Place and not when the physical or financial condition of the property reaches a <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 14 11/4/03 <br />M'mutes <br /> <br /> <br />