Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Rossi could not provide an answer to Zone 7. She mentioned that staffhas <br />looked at the DSRSD rates and there was no rate increase for 2003. Reviews for the <br />coming year have not been conducted. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan pointed out that they are independent funds and are completely <br />closed in terms ofrevanue and expenses. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico pointed out that this would not impact the General Fund, except to the <br />extent that the City has to pay its share of fees towards water and sewer facilities. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan noted that the City is required to provide those enterprise funds, <br />which is operated like its own business. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell noted that the City was $600,000 under in terms of staffing and <br />asked for further explanation. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi noted that this is a direct result of employees coming and going. Staffis <br />always estimating vacancies and the cost of vacancies, which is updated every quarter. In <br />this particular year, she pointed out that the City came in under budget in overtime <br />expenses. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan noted that staff focuses on keeping overtime expenses down, but <br />pointed out that there is a certain amount of overtime that is a part of the cost of <br />conducting business. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Mr. Brozosky, Ms. McKeehan mentioned that the <br />cost in savings is about $400,000 a year, overall, between the times when employees <br />leave the City and until replacements are hired. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Ms. Host~mmn, Ms. Rossi noted that $4 million <br />dollars would be funded for the Temporary Recession Reserves. As of June 30, 2003, <br />staffhas requested to add an additional $1.1 million dollars to that fund. As part of the <br />mid-year budget process, she noted that staffwould revisit expenditures. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Mr. Brozosky, Ms. Rossi informed him that the Mid- <br />Year Budget update is provided to Council in March; however, the process is starting the <br />beginning of January. The reason for waiting until March is to allow time for an update <br />on the property and sales taxes, which is 75 percent of the City's revenue. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Ms. Host~m,an, Ms. Rossi mentioned that previous <br />sales tax report was for sales through March of 2003. In the next several weeks, the sales <br />tax report through June 2003 would be available. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala referred to a statement made in the staff report which mentioned that if <br />the estimated revenue projection reductions show hold true, it is possible that the <br /> <br />Pleasant City Council 10 10/21/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />