CCMIN091603 - Laserfiche WebLink

obscure the retaining wall. His expectation is those trees will block the view of the retaining wall almost from the inception. Ms. Host,rotan expressed her concern regarding the school impact fee and stated that she wants the agreement signed by every developer in the Vineyard Corridor. She asked if this has occurred. Mr. Roush informed her that not every development is far enough along to where there has been a school impact fee signed by each and every developer. What has happened, however, is that, for example, Mardel, which is a developer within the Corridor, has signed the agreement. The Bemal Investment Company, (Greenbfiar Homes) has signed the agreement in context of the Bemal Property. In the agreement it does indicate for any other project, which that developer develops in Pleasanton, that developer is agreeing to the higher school impact fee. Since Greenbriar Homes either owns or has an option on a number of parcels within the Vineyard Avenue Corridor, presumably it will also sign for those parcels as well. Again, he reiterated that Centext Homes has signed an agreement. Their development agreement, which requires the property owners to enter into a school impact fee agreement. In one way or another, the developers of the property are contractually obligated to sign the school impact fee agreement. Ms. Hosterman would like to know how the City could be assured, and have we assured that the school agreement will be signed regardless of developers coming on the scene and dropping out of the scene. Mr. Roush stated that ideally, it would be best for the property owner to sign the school impact fee agreement. On the other hand, the property owners have signed the development agreement, which has been recorded against the property and does obligate, assuming the property is developed residentially, those owner(s) or their successors to participate in the school impact fee agreement. Again, there is a ve~ strong argument contractually that they or their successors of interest are obligated to sign the agreement. Ms. Hosterman wondered if they would be held to this agreement as the current council understands it. Mr. Roush felt confident to the extent there is a development agreement that pertains to the property within the Corridor, those developers would eventually sign, specifically, a school impact fee agreement. There maybe a couple of parcels that do not have development agreements, but if they do not, they have a PUD condition that requires them to sign the school impact fee agreement at the time building permits are pulled. Since the Chrisman development project was previously before the Council, Ms. Hosterman wondered about developers coming and going. This leaves a new developer in place and Council could end up with a project that is different than the Council thought Pleasanton City Council 15 09/16/03 Minutes