My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN100703
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN100703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:38 AM
Creation date
10/2/2003 3:36:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/7/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN100703
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Ayala indicated her confusion. She mentioned the Planning Commission had <br />imposed Cn'een Building measures that Council had not seen, to which Mr. Swift <br />indicated as correct. She pointed out that Council is being asked to approve measures <br />that the Council has not seen, and staff could not assure her that the house designs total <br />50 points. She indicated she had called staff earlier in the afternoon and posed this <br />question. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift indicated that he was not sure whether the design added up to 50 points <br />because he has not had a chance to compare the measures that were included in the <br />developer's new list against that point schedule. He thought the applicant might be able <br />to answer that question. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala stated that some pieces are missing. If we have bodies that are part of <br />the process, which so far have worked with the Green Building measures, she is not <br />comfortable with the way this is coming to the Council. She believed the Chamber and <br />believed that the Commission should have been involved in any kind of discussion. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hosterman pointed out that these measures are no part of an ordinance. Had <br />we gotten to that point and decided to go in that direction, then the community and the <br />Chamber would have been involved in that process. To her, this is more of an incentive <br />program where the Planning Commission has said that as projects come before it, it has <br />an interest in effectuating Green Building processes. To that end, this is a list of what we <br />would like for you to attain. Take a look at this list and tell us what you think you can <br />meet from this list and encourage you to do so. She believed this to be the current <br />process, which seemed to be more of an incentive program, unlike commercial projects. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayaia pointed out that the revised condition requires the Green Building <br />measures to total to a minimum of 50 points as adopted. She asked the question, adopted <br />by whom? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl informed her that in a residential project, a developer does not know all <br />of the measures that will be incorporated until right up to the time the builder is ready to <br />have a building permit issued. In some cases, the measures change even as the project is <br />being built because of the nature of the types of measures that are included in their list. <br />Sometimes, certain kinds of things are available and new things and new products come <br />on line all the time. Although there is a list, there usually are some adjustments of those <br />as the projects move forward. He noted this is the way they have been doing it in the past <br />with respect to the list that has been initially recommended for approval by the Planning <br />Commission, and then adopted by Council. The only difference now is that there is a <br />new list of standardized measures that total 150 points that developers can choose from to <br />attain 50 points, which is the only new part of this. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if he could reassure her that what is in the current plan will add <br />up to 50 points. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 12 10/07/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.