Laserfiche WebLink
reaches the approval stage. He believed it would be two years in the process. He understood the <br />desire of Council for smaller units and will work on opportunities. <br /> <br /> Carol Spain, 1068 Hancock Court, indicated that when Bonde Ranch was being built, she <br />was part of a neighborhood steering committee that worked with the developer, staff and <br />Council. There was an agreement that the public access from the Lund Ranch connecting to <br />Ventana Hills (Livingston Way) would become an emergency vehicle access only road. She <br />referred to the earlier discussions regarding the Happy Valley access road. The agreement of the <br />prior Council was that Livingston Way would become an emergency vehicle access road only <br />and traffic from Middleton Way would route through Lund Ranch. She believed that if Council <br />converted Livingston Way to an EVA, it would give assurance to the residents of Happy Valley <br />that the public access near the golf course would revert to an EVA. She had documentation of <br />the agreement. On another topic, it was admirable for Council to want to increase the density, <br />but she felt it would be a disaster to do it on this property. It is beautiful and in order to increase <br />density, it would be necessary to heavily grade the hills. She did not want that to happen. When <br />people bought homes from Shappel the CC&Rs contained a notice regarding Livingston Way. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Campbell, seconded by Ms. Ayala, to authorize the City <br />Manager to execute a contract with Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc. for consulting services <br />to complete an EIR for the Lund Ranch II proposed development. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Brozosky, Campbell, Hosterman, and Mayor Pico <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6c <br />Review of Zone 7 Lake "I" maintenance road pro.iect.. <br /> <br />This item was discussed earlier in the agenda. <br /> <br />(SR 03:158) <br /> <br />Item 6d <br />PAP-48 (PV-83/PADR-736), Brett L. Hoffman <br />Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a variance application to allow an existing <br />detached shed to maintain a zero (0) foot sideyard setback from the western side yard <br />property line where a three foot side yard setback is required.. (SR 03:160) <br /> <br />This item was continued to 6/17/03 at the applicant's request. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 21 06/03/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />