My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060303
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN060303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:37 AM
Creation date
5/28/2003 11:32:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/3/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN060303
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
necessary. He doubted the new trees will have any impact in five years. He did not believe the <br />EIR adequately addressed the wildlife in the area. He noted numerous sightings of the fox. The <br />quarry and buffer strip tie into the open areas on E1 Charro. He noted sightings of deer drinking <br />in the lake. He believed Ponderosa Homes needs dirt for its project and he agreed with the prior <br />speaker to remove the berm near Persimmon and give it to Ponderosa. He wanted to expand the <br />buffer zone so it goes around the lake, continuing to tie into the E1 Charro side to give the <br />animals a larger area to roam and keep it as natural as possible. He invited Council to view the <br />area. <br /> <br /> Kate Selway, 2313 Martin Avenue, indicated the buffer zone was created forty years ago <br />to reduce noise and dust pollution. The trees help that considerably. Only one lake has been <br />filled and there are still six other quarries. She has made inquiries to the County about its plans <br />and she expected a call later in the week. Regarding tree removal, the staff report said since the <br />heritage trees are not in a public right of way, they are not subject to the City tree removal laws. <br />One of the options of Zone 7 is to turn the area over to the City and she believed if that were to <br />happen, then the trees would be subject to City laws, unless Zone 7 removed the trees and then <br />turned the property over the City. Regarding the wildlife, she noted the numerous sightings of <br />the kit fox a few years ago, when a County representative was called to the area. He informed <br />the residents it was endangered and could not be captured since this was its natural habitat. She <br />noted pictures are available. Finally, she referred to the aesthetics of the area. Zone 7 believes <br />the view of the lake is more important than the residents believe. The banks of the slopes have <br />deep furrows and no vegetation and this is not a pleasing view. She noted Bushart Gardens in <br />Vancouver, British Columbia, which was planted in an abandoned quarry. <br /> <br />There were no further speakers. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said this property is owned by Zone 7 and is in Alameda County, not within <br />City limits. The City can discuss and encourage action to Zone 7. It has been responsive to <br />issues raised by the residents and City staff. The staff recommendation is to authorize sending a <br />letter urging Zone 7 to slow its process and to look at other alternatives along with the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell indicated the Zone 7 Liaison Committee met last week and Zone 7 <br />appeared willing to work with the residents and the City to find a win/win solution. He <br />supported the letter and agreed the buffer area should be preserved. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hosterman agreed with those comments. She appreciated the opportunity to meet <br />with the Zone 7 Boardmembers at the Liaison Committee meeting. Zone 7 also has concerns <br />and seems willing to work on these issues. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Hosterman, seconded by Mr. Brozosky, to send a letter to Zone <br />7, which requests it to (1) postpone action on the draft Negative Declaration, (2) continue to <br />explore options of maintenance of the recharge "face" of Lake "I", which minimizes <br />impacts to the beneficial neighborhood values of the "buffer strip," and (3) work with the <br />City to allow continued public access to the "buffer strip" consistent with prior City-Zone 7 <br />public use agreements for Zone 7 open space areas. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 18 06/03/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.