My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN050603
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN050603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:37 AM
Creation date
4/30/2003 11:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/6/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION <br /> <br />4n. Traffic Committee Minutes <br /> <br /> Ms. Hosterman referred to the discussion regarding the Del Valle parking lot and she said <br />she had heard from neighbors with concerns and she wanted to pull this item and discuss it <br />further. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico indicated Council could not discuss this now. He also did not know if there <br />had been a formal proposal filed. He felt it would have a process to go through before it reached <br />the Council level. <br /> <br /> Ms. Nerland said the structure would be entirely on School District property and is being <br />processed by the State Architect's office. It is not expected to come before the City Council for <br />review. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said concerns could be relayed through the School Liaison Committee <br />meeting. Any hearings on this would be before the School Board. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico understood that the church would be using this parking lot as well and felt if <br />there were something on School property that was not solely for educational purposes, that the <br />City could have some input. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said there was some question about "solely" and noted that if it used for <br />educational purposes, then the City has not had an opportunity to comment other than from a <br />voluntary basis. The District has in the past involved staff in designs for ingress and egress from <br />parking lots. In terms of approval, there has not been a joint approval process for anything on <br />School property which has an educational purpose. This lot does, even though there would be <br />joint use with the church. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked if it is certain the students and faculty will use this lot? <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan indicated there are fifty spaces for school use and suggested this be <br />brought to the School Liaison Committee for discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Campbell confirmed that the lot will be for student use. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala pointed out there has been no discussion at the Liaison Committee to date. <br />She noted the parking lot is causing relocation of certain sports fields and there is concerns about <br />activity near residences. She believed there is a District neighborhood meeting this Thursday to <br />discuss this and she urged the citizens to attend. <br /> <br />40. Reimbursement Agreement with Dublin for final design and construction of the 1-580/E1 <br />Charro Road Interchange. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 9 05/06/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.