My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN020403
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN020403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
2/27/2003 5:04:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN020403
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Andrew Gusha, 5168 Mt. Tam Circle, and Steven Sanchez indicated they like to ride <br />BMX bikes and there is nowhere in Pleasanton they can ride legally. They would like to use the <br />in-line skate park as well. The City has built a skateboard park and is in the process of building <br />an in-line skate park, but there is no where for BMX. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wolfe said the City is in discussions with East Bay Regional Park District to lease a <br />portion of Shadow Cliffs on the western side. Three acres will be used for a BMX track. <br /> <br />Mr. Gusha asked if it were cement? <br /> <br /> Mr. Wolfe said it will be a free form dirt area where the participants can create their own <br />jumps within reason. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked if the young men wanted cement. <br /> <br />Mr. Gusha said yes. The Val Vista plan is looking very good. <br /> <br /> Jerry Thorne, 5144 Hummingbird, Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission, said a <br />very exhaustive process was used to develop the design of the park. It was first discussed in <br />1998. A Task Force was developed in 1999 to design the park. All the meetings were open to <br />the public. The master plan was presented to the Commission in July 2000 and then approved by <br />the City Council. Groundbreaking was about a year ago. He was glad that most of the neighbors <br />felt very good about the park and were supporters of it. There were then complaints and the <br />Commission reviewed the plan again, with public input. One of the reasons the Commission <br />recommended lowering the facility was that apparently there were misunderstandings about the <br />drawings, which is understandable. He believed the two-three foot drop is the best solution. As <br />an individual, he supported the Commission recommendation and felt it was a good compromise <br />with the neighbors. He did not believe the facility would be as good if the bowl were removed. <br />He expressed concern about spending an additional hundred thousand dollars for this project. He <br />urged Council to accept the Commission recommendations. <br /> <br /> Jaime Weber, 6872 Hen'in Court, said her house is the closest to the bowl of the in-line <br />skate park. She was very excited about the project until she saw the first stakes going in and <br />realized how close they were to her fence. She had several conversations with Mr. Fulford about <br />the trees, screening, the fence, etc. She was told it was a ground level facility. She said the <br />process only works if the fight information is given to the public. She said with the apron, the <br />bowl is thirty feet from her yard. Her husband went to many of these meetings and it was never <br />apparent there was a height issue or that the bowl would be so close. She brought up her <br />concerns as soon as possible. To her, the most critical part of this is the height. No public <br />facility designed for the use of children should have areas that cannot be supervised. The height <br />of this element does not allow viewing in the 30' x 70' corridor bordering the residential areas on <br />the east. Police would not be able to see the area from their vehicles. She supported the staff <br />report. She believed that the either the City pays the additional $170,000 to lower this facility, or <br />it should be removed entirely. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 9 02/04/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.