CCMIN010703 - Laserfiche WebLink

The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Coun¢ilmembers Ayala, Brozosky, Campbell, Hosterman and Mayor Pico NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Item 4e Revise Various Speed Limits on City of Pleasanton Streets as part of the 2002 Speed Limit Review and Update of Engineering and Traffic Surveys. (SR 03:005) Mr. Roush gave background information to the staff report by saying that in order for the police to use radar, the State law provides that a city has to do an engineering and traffic study every five to seven years if a city is going to establish a speed limit other than the primafacia limits, which essentially are either 25 mph or 65 mph. Obviously, the city does not want either of those limits on city streets in many areas. Accordingly, because the police department does intend to and does use rads, from time to time people who are given speeding tickets will request to see the information that was relied upon to establish the posted speed limit. Normally, the speed limit is set at the 85th percentile, the speed at which 85 percent or fewer of the vehicles are traveling. In certain instances, the court was fmdin~that there were certain speed limits that had been set more than 10 miles per hour below the 85 percentile and that the engineering and other traffic analysis that went along with that did not support reducing that speed by that much. Accordingly, under case law, the court felt that it had no choice but to throw that citation out. When that happened two or three times, the police department contacted Mr. Knowles and myself, saying that the City needed to go out and take a city-wide look, update some surveys to make sure our traffic information is accurate so that the police department can use radar effectively and the citations that are issued could be used in court. As a result of that, the Engineering Department has conducted a traffic survey on a number of streets. Mr. Knowles presented the staff report. Mr. Brozosky stated that some residents had some concerns about the Stoneridge Road area east of Santa Rita Road with the limits being increased from 35 mph to 40 mph and specifically, Stoneridge Drive next to Neilson Park, which is an unfenced park, with children playing. Also, many of the apartments on the north side of Stonefidge can only be accessed by making a u-turn at Kamp Drive. Making a u-turn with cars moving at 40 mph at an unprotected intersection is not safe. He inquired about not changing the speed limits on that segment until the East Side Study is complete which would let us know the future of Stoneridge Drive. Mr. Knowles responded saying the report is for the existing conditions only. Eighty percent of the drivers are currently violating the 35 mph signs. So what value does the current sign have? The traffic committee's feeling is that speeds will not increase by raising those limits. If it were the ease that speeds automatically go up based on the speed sign we would be talking about adjusting 115 speed limits and not just 15. Most of traffic signs are closer to the critical speed than on the roads listed in the report. The concern is the ability to establish a Pleasanton City Council 5 01/07/03 Minutes