CCMIN111902 - Laserfiche WebLink

could not be built in the same period of time. There are plans for the school and everything is in place except a Board that will make the decision. Kevin Rabon, 3127 Washoe Way, expressed his appreciation for the years of service to the community by Ms. Michelotti and Ms. Dennis. They have both done a wonderful job. He looked forward to working with them in the future. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS Item 4e Approval of Third Supplemental Agreement with Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) addressing wastewater rights, groundwater injection and temporary, capaei~. allocations. (SR 02:269) Scott Baker presented the staff report. Ms. Ayala felt it was important for the public to know that by this agreement the reverse osmosis (RO) treated water will not be injected into our groundwater basis without Pleasanton's approval. That is a result of the voters of Pleasanton and its influence on DSRSD. Pleasanton is DSRSD's largest customer. There is now discussion of who owns the wastewater since it may have some value. She referred to page 5 of the staffreport and the reference to the recycled water feasibility study by HydroScience Engineers, Inc. in 1999. She was concerned that no costs were identified. DSRSD has built the RO plant which is costly and she was concerned DSRSD will go back to the ratepayers and raise the rates in order to pay for it. She asked for reassurance that will not happen, since that report was not able to determine a reliable pricing. Steve Cusenza said the HydroScience report was done just for the City of Pleasanton. The (_p_SRSD~ast Bay Municipal Utilities District [EBMUD]) Recycled Water Authority (DERWA) project is funded separately than the topic of the HydroScience report. That was only to see how feasible an individual project would be and how much water would be required. That has not been brought to Council because of the cost at that time and other environmental issues. The DERWA project is funded separately by DSRSD and EBMUD and will not affect the Pleasanton ratepayers. Ms. Ayala was still concerned that the costs had not been identified. Ms. McKeehan explained that the HydroScience study was to see if there were projects in Pleasanton that could use recycled water from the City's existing wastewater. That study was not a high priority, which is why it has not been pursued to use the RO. Staffcen identify the price of the water, but the question is what is the price of a project in Pleasanton. An example is using the recycled water for the golf course, but that is not cost effective today. The study was not finished because it was too difficult or for any other reason; it just did not have a high priority. Pleasanton City Council 8 11/19/02 Minutes