My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN100102
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN100102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:35 AM
Creation date
10/25/2002 4:07:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/1/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN100102
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
__ Ms. McKeehan said these are actuarial estimates from PERS in terms of what they are <br /> going to charge the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Renholts thought that instead of charging $723,000 in the second year, PERS is only <br />going to charge $49,000 for the same benefit. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said that referred to the incremental increase from the previous year. The <br />point of that chart is to show the actual costs which are located in the columns to the left of the <br />chart. She also noted the percentages represent payroll charges. <br /> <br /> Linda Gregory, 2000 Embarcadero # 110, Oakland, professional staff representative for <br />the Pleasanton City Employees Association, said the tentative agreement before Council was <br />reached after serious consideration and negotiations in good faith with the City's representative <br />with the assumption that the terms being discussed had the support of the Council. There was a <br />decisive, though not unanimous, vote of the membership to ratify the agreement. It was not <br />unanimous because some people are wary of long term agreements. She hoped Council would <br />vote decisively to approve the agreement and implement its terms. In her long career of <br />representing public employees, it has seldom been her pleasure to represent a group that has a <br />greater sense of personal investment in the services that their city provides. The Pleasanton <br />employees have a strong work ethic and sense of pride in how well the city is run. This <br />agreement is an investment in those employees and one which will benefit the city over a period <br />of time in stability and the ability to have better control over the ability to recruit and retain. For <br />all these reasons, she urged Council to approve the agreement at this meeting. <br /> <br /> Diane Churka, 507 St. John Street, indicated she was grateful to Ms. Ayala for bringing <br />this issue to an open heating. She was concerned about this because it was not possible at this <br />time to know what funding cuts will come from the state. She noted Contra Costa spent $13 <br />million to construct a school, and is still waiting for reimbursement from the state. The Orinda <br />School District has been waiting for state funding for two years. She asked what would happen <br />to Pleasanton's budget if it does not get promised state funding? The City Manager has done a <br />masterful job in maintaining the City's treasury. She noted the State budget once had a surplus <br />of billions and a few months later is now has a deficit. She was concerned about the projections <br />made by the staff. The stock market has hit unprecedented lows and it is unknown how much <br />lower it can go. The country is at war on terrorism and the President wants to attack Iraq and she <br />was concerned how that would affect the economy. A news report said it would cost nine billion <br />dollars a day for the war. What would happen if Saudia Arabia lodged an oil embargo? How <br />would that affect Pleasanton and how are we going to finance a military build up? How can we <br />predict a rosy future with all this uncertainty. She said the Consumer Price Index in the last ten <br />years has risen less than one percent, yet this contract provides a 4% increase over the long tenn. <br />She was also concerned about a retirement age of 55. She did not think it was appropriate to <br />equate the retirement age of firemen and police officers with the rest of the city employees. At a <br />time when Americans are living longer and Social Security is delayed to older ages, how can <br />Pleasanton lower the bar? Last week a family leave bill was adopted by the state, how will that <br />affect the City staff?. None of these questions have been answered in the staff report. The City <br />Manager said the instability of the economy meant it is a good time to negotiate this contract <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />10/01/02 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.