My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN082002
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN082002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:35 AM
Creation date
9/25/2002 9:57:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/20/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN082002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jennifer Hosterman, 2922 Chardonnay Drive, said that since the community has an urban <br />growth boundary and housing cap, it is important to focus on smart in-fill and smart growth and <br />she felt this project truly is a smart growth project. She supported affordable senior housing and <br />the green building features as well as the amenities of this project and the trails connections. She <br />was happy about the church site. She liked the fact that the project was targeting people who <br />work in Pleasanton as future purchasers. She liked the zero net energy house. She referred to <br />the Centex house in Livermore and highly recommended the Night Breeze fan. She asked that <br />the green building standards be the same for all the units. She asked Council if there was an <br />oppommity to review green building policies for the entire City and if Ponderosa would be <br />receptive to looking at those. Finally, with all the amenities of this project, it takes pressure off <br />the Bernal property and may give an opportunity to do things on the Bernal property that will <br />serve the community. <br /> <br /> Michael Janjigian, 1501 Maple Leaf Drive, indicated his property backed up to the <br />Ponderosa property and he felt Ponderosa had done a great job addressing the concerns of the <br />neighborhood. He felt he was speaking for all the neighbors on the northeast side and for Frank <br />Gordet (who had to leave) in saying that they all approve of this project. He referred to some <br />people who try to cut through his neighborhood to get to Livermore and realize they can't get <br />through. He is happy that connection is still not be there. He was happy about the size of lots <br />behind his neighborhood. He wanted to control speed and referred to the Ponderosa proposal to <br />narrow the street entrance and strip the streets as well as other mitigations for Kamp Drive. He <br />was happy about receiving an addition ten feet of property and fence improvements. Comparing <br />this project to the one five years ago, it has been a very good experience this time and he <br />supported the project. <br /> <br /> Steve Brozosky, 1700 Vineyard Avenue, said he participated in some of the workshops <br />and public hearings regarding the Ponderosa project and he felt Ponderosa had done an <br />extremely good job. The process it used worked very well. Ponderosa was not satisfied until the <br />community was satisfied with the project. Every part of the plan brings something to the <br />community and he noted the affordable housing and senior housing. He noted there was an <br />opportunity for the City to buy down the cost of some of the affordable units to make them more <br />affordable for low income families. Trying to lower the price of existing units is much cheaper <br />than trying to build new units. There are always trade-offs for space for community events. He <br />felt if more space was given to the community room, it could result in fewer units in the projects. <br />He believed having the church facility nearby would be a great benefit and the seniors could use <br />that space for bigger events. He said the Presbyterian Church has served this community for 125 <br />years and this new facility will help them to expand their services. He related many of their <br />programs and the ability to use their facilities by other organizations. He approved giving the <br />School District the option for 22 acres for a long period of time to allow it to evaluate its furore <br />needs. The single-family homes have been designed around a street network that does not allow <br />cut through traffic and does not put traffic into existing neighborhoods. He liked the duet units, <br />which are affordable by design. This is great for those who do not qualify for affordable units, <br />but cannot afford the larger market rate single-family units. In addition, the development will <br />construct a trail and a park for the residents. That pool will be available to the senior residents as <br />well and that is unique to the City. He enthusiastically supports this development. This is a <br />model for future developments. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 14 08/20/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.