CCMIN031902 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Dennis indicated a development like Promenade would fall under that description and noted that it is 50/50 in market and affordable units. Christine Steiner, 596 Hamilton Way, Housing Commissioner, commended Council for recommending a park like vision for the property. She had attended meetings when the uses were site specific and large pieces were taken out by the school and lighted sports park. She was concerned about the School District having forty acres on Bernal when it already has twenty acres on the Busch property with the possibility of acquiring more property on the Hansen/Kaiser lands. Staff has said this would be a better location for a school facility. Someone needs to say the District does not need the Bernal property. Although there is 300 acres, a lot of that is around the west side of the property and to be used for trails and open space and not buildable. She does not support going to the ballot at this time. She felt it was too early because the two committees need to be brought together to review the site. Everyone is trying to work together to get a consensus and she felt the community has accepted the fact there will be housing on the property, including some affordable units. She felt there is also a community belief that there will be something great on this property with a lot of open space. She believed that putting a measure on the ballot will start dividing the community. People are coming to meetings and giving their input. She felt a ballot measure would be divisive and affordable housing would be a red flag. The only reason the Housing Commission is saying there needs to be affordable on the property is that unless there is City property, it nearly impossible to provide for the very low income seniors in the community. Senior incomes do not change except to go down. Even when they live in developments like Ridge View Commons, it is necessary to have rent increases. The only way to build truly affordable housing is to build another subsidized development at a level that is affordable for the truly low income seniors. This is also true for lower income families, but they have an opportunity to work out of the low income levels. She felt Council has a responsibility to designate two sites on the Bernal property for this type of housing. She felt if it was explained correctly, the community will accept this. She said if Kottinger and Pleasanton Gardens are to be redeveloped, it is critical to have a senior housing project to relocate the residents into during construction. She urged to keep the process open and keep the community involved as it has been. She did not want to take this to the ballot because it would be divisive to the community. Gene Finch, 4847 Drywood Street, felt it would be irresponsible to put the Bernal property on the ballot. Council has spent countless hours serving the community and are well aware of the needs and wants of the community. Council and staff have reviewed volumes of material on this project and he believed Council should take this knowledge and make decisions. It is Council's responsibility and why they were elected. He felt a ballot measure would be divisive. He realized there is a need for affordable housing and cited the project built by the Pleasanton North Rotary Club. He felt other service organizations could do the same. Jennifer Hosterman, 2922 Chardonnay Drive, Chair of the Bemal Property Task Force, indicated that there has been a lot of passion and participation in the meetings on this property and felt the entire city was very interested in the property. This is an ongoing, public process and invited continuing public participation. This project will take a long time. She reviewed the history of the Task Force and its charge. Its charge was to determine appropriate land uses and acreages for those categories. The Committee feels it needs additional direction. That is why a Pleasanton City Council 8 03/19/02 Minutes