My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030502
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN030502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
3/27/2002 8:43:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/5/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was approved by the County over the objection of the residents. A petition with over 200 <br />signatures had been presented to the County and was ignored. He said the original schedule did <br />not create too much havoc in Sunol. However, with no notification that schedule was modified <br />several times. The PLA added the weekend wildflower trains in April, additional train days on <br />Sundays, the Polar Express in December, first Wednesdays for school children, business <br />clubs/organizations, group charters, Saturday PLA events, special events and weddings, two <br />additional Saturdays a month, etc. He demonstrated this increase by showing a calendar with red <br />marks for train days. It has gotten to a point where there are major problems with congestion, <br />noise, safety issues, and fumes. This is unbearable to the residents. The County has not <br />acknowledged the complaints of the residents. Town meetings have been held and County <br />representatives invited along with PLA members. He said the response has been dismal. He felt <br />Pleasanton's biggest problems will be traffic, congestion and issues of safety. He believed the <br />biggest problem with the PLA is its desire to expand ridership and denial of associated problems. <br /> <br /> Robert Cordtz supported the train. He felt the Downtown Specific Plan was flawed. The <br />train recommendation was made with an incomplete study. No other excursion train operators <br />were contacted to determine key elements of success or problems. Consideration should be <br />postponed until all the relevant facts are determined. He objected to the composition of the <br />Specific Plan Committee and said he was the only residential representative. He presented a <br />flyer that was distributed at the Farmers Market and objected to it because it was not signed. He <br />disputed its contents. <br /> <br /> Larry Dom, 5150 Case Avenue, indicated he supported the train. He believed that the <br />senior residents at Ridge View Commons were being used to sway the Council's decision. He <br />noted that there was no opposition from the apartment complexes on either side of Ridge View. <br />He urged Council to approve the Specific Plan and include bringing the train back to Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Jim Hoge, 739 G Main Street, indicated he was on the Downtown Specific Plan <br />Committee and on the Parks and Trails Task Force. He commended the chairs of the two <br />organizations for a commendable job. He has spent four years on these committees and <br />commended the City staff members for their support. He indicated the Pleasanton Downtown <br />Association (PDA) supports the plan with three exceptions. The first two concern the Main <br />Street gateway and the Niles Canyon train. The PDA is taking no definite position on these <br />issues, but would like them to remain open for further study. He felt this study period would not <br />delay implementation of the balance of the Specific Plan. The third exception concerns the land <br />use designation for the east side of Peters Avenue. The current designation is office, which <br />prohibits a retail use. The PDA believes that designation should be changed to commercial, <br />which would allow retail and office uses. He felt the downtown planning process was a <br />milestone and many people have worked hard for four years. More work is needed to turn the <br />vision into a reality. The PDA looks forward to working with the City and other interested <br />parties to help create the downtown of 2012, which the plan envisions. The PDA has identified <br />seven priority items from the draft Specific Plan and has assigned them to four operating <br />committees for action: Economic Restructuring; Design and Beautification; Promotions; and <br />Marketing Committees. He encouraged anyone with an interest in downtown to volunteer for <br />the PDA committees and gave the address and phone number of the PDA. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 12 03/05/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.