CCMIN020502 - Laserfiche WebLink

the land to operate their train. The adviso~ vote, Measure DD, specifically said "at no cost to the city". The five train alternatives were included in the scope of the EIR just to resolve some of the issues. We know they don't have the money to bring the train to town at this point in time. It is time to move on. The Master Trails Plan has many wonderful elements and it will take a lot of money to implement the capital improvements. It is important to keep the vision in mind. Staff feels it is important that a potential developer in the downtown area be given a document that sets forth specifically what can and cannot be done. He urged Council not to put this to a vote of the people because there is too much information and detail for the average voter to be properly informed. Regarding Vervais Park and the Master Trails Plan, the vision there is fi.om Bernal to Spring Street. The Trails Plan incorporates 368 parking spaces along with a trail that would accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians. The Arroyo trail was designed to go to Harvest Circle, and has been washed out. It was to be designed to be handicapped accessible. The bridge at the northern end of Main Street will be enhanced and the park must be designed to be handicapped accessible. These are all conceptual plans and it is intended that the projects will be fine-tuned as they come forward. Jack Dove, 5250 Case Avenue, S110, believed that if the railroad station were located south of Bernai, it would create problems with the use of the Senior Center and would impose on the parking for the Senior Center and perhaps even the Raleys Shopping Center. It is not just noise that is a problem with the train. He urged Council to make a decision and put this matter to rest now. He said it was unfortunate that some people think if you don't support an item, then you are against it. He comes from a railroad town and has visited English villages where steam trains still run. It is a wonderful experience and he believed it is possible to reach some agreement with the PLA and with the PDA. This is similar to the situation with the Busch property. Years ago, everyone was polarized, however after more meetings and negotiations, he felt an acceptable project has been produced. He felt a number of people would be willing to further investigate the train issue to get some compromise to bring the train to town and not disturb the parking and trail on the Transportation Corridor. Bonnie Krichbaum, 303 Neal Street, read a letter from Becky Durette, a neighbor on Second Street. Ms. Durette opposed the train extension into downtown. It sounds romantic, but in reality the train is loud, smelly and dirty. She did not want that downtown. She felt it was fun to ride once or twice, but quickly gets boring. Parking and safety are huge concerns. An excursion train bringing tourists to town reminds her of Fisherman's Wharf, Carmel and Monterey. Pleasanton is our home, not a tourist attraction. Downtown and its neighborhoods already have beauty and historical value. She felt creating a tourist attraction will only degrade the neighborhood and community. She shops downtown as often as possible. Two things will keep her coming downtown: more parking and more stores with character that sell goods she actually uses, like Fleet Feet, Ace Hardware, Domus, Town Centre Books, GR Doodlebug, Martial Arts America, and Coffee Roast Express. The train will not provide any of these things. She likes the proposed Downtown Specific Plan because of the parks and trails. With over thirty children on Second Street, the families spend time walking, biking and skating. The Friday night concerts are very popular. The parks and trails will make downtown an even better place to gather. Ms. Krichbaum believed the reason Council is not looking at the Parks and Trails Plan at this time is that the majority of the property will be set aside for the train if it comes downtown. Pleasanton City Council 13 Minutes 02/05/02