Laserfiche WebLink
Jennifer Mosel, a representative of Community Resources for Independent Living, 3311 <br />Pacific Avenue, Livcrmore, indicated her non-profit organization works with people of all ages <br />with disabilities. Their incomes vary greatly, but are mostly between $712 to $1,000 per month. <br />People often must choose among rent, foot, and prescriptions. She said 20% of every city's <br />population has a disability. That includes seniors with disabilities. As the population ages, the <br />number of people with disabilities also increases. One of the services her agency offers is <br />assistance in finding affordable housing. Unfortunately there are not a lot of affordable units in <br />Pleasanton or the Tri-Valley. This means our children, friends, parents and grandparents have to <br />move out of the area. Often the only units they can find are in Sacramento, Tracy, Chico or even <br />Nevada. This means they have to move away from their doctors and support groups, which <br />exacerbates their problems. Please remember affordable housing is anything below the median <br />income of $71,600 for a family of four. That means that half of our population lives in <br />affordable housing. The majority of CRIL's clients are in the very low or extremely low income <br />category. This is the range in which the fewest number of units are available. She was <br />encouraged to see the recommended incentives for non-profit housing developers. Those are <br />very important to make sure the zoning is in place so they don't have to spend money to change <br />the zoning. She was also encouraged by the inclusion of "in perpetuity" language. That will <br />insure the units are available for a very long time. She believed the Union City in lieu fee was so <br />high in order to insure that the units actually get built or that the city would have enough money <br />to build them. She understood that not all subdivisions are suitable for affordable housing, such <br />as golf course communities. But are those developers providing housing in some other way such <br />as donating land or paying fees? In response to some comments about not wanting "those <br />people" in Pleasanton, she reminded everyone that "those people" are your neighbors who fell on <br />the job and got hurt, your grandparents, parents, and children. She is encouraged by this <br />Housing Element draft and the fact that it is sending a message that you would like the <br />community to be inclusive. She urged Council to continue with this. <br /> <br /> John Chapman, 671 Clipper Hill Road, Danville, indicated he was a long time <br />environmentalist. He believed this issue was quite conflicted. On the one side we have concems <br />about the negative impacts of development such as loss of open space, farmland, environmental <br />degradation, air quality, traffic congestion, etc. On the other hand, we see the problems of post- <br />war housing development patterns. He said 80% of the families in this county cannot afford to <br />buy a new house. Our children cannot afford to live here in Pleasanton and many teachers <br />cannot stay long hours after school to meet with students because they have to commute long <br />distances to their homes out of the Valley. Critical services workers like policemen, nurses, <br />firemen, and other people can't afford to live here. If these people are forced to live in the <br />Central Valley, we face even worse consequences to the environment because these families <br />spend long hours driving back and forth to their jobs. He said environmentalists have a core <br />value they call environmental justice and they do not feel it is just for people not to be able to <br />live near where they work. That is what is occurring in many areas. He referred to the Sierra <br />Club web page and its comments on smart growth. Many of the solutions set forth on the web <br />page already exist in Pleasanton, such as vibrant downtowns, mixed uses, walkable <br />neighborhoods, access to nature, etc. Unfortunately there are two places where Pleasanton is out <br />of compliance with the Sierra Club recommendations. One of them is the jobs/housing match. <br />One aspect of that is that housing should match the incomes of the people who work in the area; <br />not just the executives, but also the service workers, teachers, shopkeepers, etc. Most of the Tri- <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Joint Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />7 11/15/01 <br /> <br /> <br />