My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN100201
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN100201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
10/19/2001 5:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/2/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN100201
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cindy McGovern, President of the School District Board of Trustees, reviewed the two <br />types of agreements. The amendment to the Cooperative Fee Agreement is an agreement that <br />amends an agreement with Signature Properties and Standard Pacific to design and construct <br />Neal Elementary School. It has been signed by Signature and Standard Pacific and approved and <br />signed by the Board. The Gift Agreement is an agreement to cover the cost of the District's <br />portion of the Vineyard Corridor infrastructure for the Neal Elementary School, the expansion of <br />two high schools and for future facility needs attributed to growth. Since January of this year, <br />each of the developers that signed the original Points of Agreement is paying the gift fee of $6.50 <br />per square foot. To date Ponderosa Homes has signed the new Gift Agreement. She believed <br />this new agreement is better than the one signed in 1992 and presented six reasons to support <br />that: 1. The District's attorney has given his opinion that the flat fee agreement signed in 1992 is <br />no longer applicable due to SB 50. 2. The District will continue to collect fees on new <br />construction until build out of the community. The old agreements stopped after the building of <br />Neal Elementary and the improvements to the two high schools. 3. The development <br />community is agreeing to gift dollars to the District over and above the state statutory fee of <br />$2.05 per square foot. 4. The development community has agreed to pay those dollars on up to <br />7,000 square feet of building space. The old agreements were capped at 5,000 square feet. 5. <br />There are two developers who agree to build an elementary school. 6. Together, these two <br />agreements, over time, will collect millions of additional dollars for school facilities over and <br />above any agreements previously entered into. She said the District still has concerns. Today's <br />economy has had a direct influence on the District's facility plans, although these two <br />agreements will provide the funding needed for the shoxt and long term facility needs. It is the <br />timing of receiving the funds that has changed. The District's funding is fled to residential units <br />being constructed and the current economy has flooded the market with homes for sale. It has <br />decreased the developers' ability to garner construction loans and has caused people to move out <br />of California because they can no longer afford to live here. It will take some time for the state <br />and nation to right itself. She believed these conditions magnify the need for the Board and the <br />City Council to continue working together with the development commtmity. We must continue <br />to work together in a non-adversarial manner to seek options of how to construct the Vineyard <br />Corridor infrastructure. The Board and District staff remain committed to building Neal <br />Elementary and the expansions of our high schools. <br /> <br /> Mary Frances Callan, Superintendent of the Pleasanton Unified School District, said that <br />under the new rules set by SB 50, it is the opinion of the Board, District staff and legal counsel <br />that these are fine agreements. The District is aware that as the agreements are implemented, the <br />stream of funding may be less than it would like. However, the District is confident that if75- <br />150 homes are built a year, the revenue will be sufficient to carry out short term plans and plan <br />for the long term. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis referred to the figure of 75-150 homes per year and asked if that was <br />discussed in reviewing the cash flows. <br /> <br /> Dr. Callan said about 55 building permits had been pulled as of August and the District <br />looked at what would happen if only 75-150 homes were built. The District was concerned that <br />a reduction in the number of homes would keep it fi:om moving forward on the Points of <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 10/02/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.