My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN100201
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN100201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
10/19/2001 5:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/2/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN100201
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
forward in good faith. We approved the Points of Agreement in February 2000 and those were <br />agreed to unanimously. The question raised at this meeting was whether we have a better deal <br />on the table. Is the Amended Cooperative Fee Agreement better? She referred to a letter in the <br />packed signed by Cindy McGovern urging approval of the agreement. She referred to another <br />letter presented today signed by four Boardmembers saying the same thing. She believes that <br />when a person makes a deal, she takes them at their word. When she takes a stand and makes a <br />commitment to individuals who have performed their part of the bargain and will build for this <br />community the Neal School as soon as infrastructure is available, she will not go back on her <br />word. She believes this agreement is a better deal for this community. She has faith in the <br />School Board to make decisions and to bring those Girl Agreements in. She will be available to <br />encourage and assist in any way she can. She did not need a document that requires her to <br />legally be involved. When this first came before Council in June, she agreed to provide time for <br />Ms. Ayala to get all the information she required. Tonight is the time to take action and she <br />encouraged Council to move forward and support the School Board. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis thanked everyone who has worked so hard on this agreement. She believed <br />that no matter what the opinions or misgivings about the agreement are, everyone has done their <br />part to come up with something that is the best possible. She was not intimately involved in the <br />negotiations for the agreement, but because it is a big change, she wanted to hear from the people <br />most affected by the agreement as far as their ability to make it work. That would certainly be <br />the School District, even though the City is part of the agreement. She supported the District and <br />its staff in its efforts to bring resources for the children and the schools. What she wanted to hear <br />from the District was its confidence that it can make this work. She believed she has heard a <br />public commitment from the District that it will work. It has answered the questions presented <br />and affirmed its commitment. In the District's best judgment, this is a good agreement. She <br />believed Council should go forward with this Agreement. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell said he was a teacher at Amador Valley High School. He firmly believed <br />this is one of the best school districts in the State as well as the nation. The students are amazing <br />and the teachers work very hard. The on-site administrators, District staff and School Board also <br />work hard and cooperate. He had complete trust in the Board, Council and District staff. He <br />wanted to sign the Cooperative Fee Agreement and get on with it. There are no guarantees in <br />life. Whenever an agreement is entered into, it can't be perfect. There is a limitation of words, <br />that is why we have lawyers. You have to trust that the people making the decisions are making <br />the right decisions. He put his faith in the professionals and elected officials who have studied <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Campbell, seconded by Ms. Michelotti, to adopt Resolution No. <br />01-105, accepting the revisions to the Cooperative Fee Agreement and authorizing the <br />Mayor to sign the agreement. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said it did not make a difference whether the attorneys were right or wrong <br />about whether the 1993 agreement no longer exists and is superseded by an amendment. The <br />reality is that there was an unwillingness to enforce the terms of the 1993 Cooperative Fee <br />Agreement. That unwillingness to enforce it or litigate the matter meant the agreement was not <br />any good anymore. All parties agreed to move forward to find a better way to fund the needs of <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 10/02/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.