My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN061901
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN061901
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
7/20/2001 3:34:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN061901
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 6b <br />Ad~ of <br />(1) 2~0!-02/2002-03 Operating Budget and Commulllty Development Block Grant <br />Pro.am (SR 01:153) <br />(2) City of Ple~to~ Five Yem' Capit~i Improvement Progrm~ for fbe~i yem <br />2001~02 through 20054)6 (SR 01:154) <br /> <br /> City Manager Deborah McKeehan presented an overview of the budget. Sue <br />Rossi, Finance Director, presented the proposed Operating/General Budget and Steven <br />Bocian, Deputy City Manager, presented the Capital Improvement Program Budget. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico stated that the City creates reserves for projects even though the City <br />does not know exactly what is going to happen in the future. He asked if there was a <br />reason that the City could not create a reserve for an arts project or program, similar to <br />what is being done with community parks. Why could we not start to put some money on <br />the board for arts projects so people can see this in a more tangible way. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said is the choice of the Council. The reason the staff did not do <br />it in this budget was because staff felt the master plans were the beginning of that <br />process. Once the master plans are complete and once Council sets a project as a priority, <br />then reserves are allocated to a project. The City does not yet know how that money is <br />going to be spent. It could go entirely for a public arts facility, if that is what comes out <br />in the public planning process. The City is trying to maintain respect for the process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico said that through the telephone calls he had received, part of the concern <br />is that the City has a process going on for the Bernal Property but that there are other <br />issues and other potential projects, such as the potential uses in the Amador Valley <br />Community Park, where there are some existing cultural facilities that may be modified. <br />In the budget, when we look at the reserves for the Amador Valley Community Park for <br />the next five years, we are setting aside almost $700,000. Is there a plan that part of this <br />is for public arts, or is that money for something that is vepj specific to some <br />improvements at the Amador Park? <br /> <br /> Ms. McKechan said that this involved two different things. With the Amador <br />Park Master Plan process, the City does not know at this time what is going to come out <br />at the end of the process. The arts groups will be involved in designing it. Any ultimate <br />use that comes out of the master planning process could use these funds that have been <br />set aside. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico said that there are also $500,000 budgeted for the potential reuse of Fire <br />Station No. 1. Again, that could be money for some kind of civic arts/cultural arts kind <br />ofprogrem, depending on the ultimate use that comes out of that facility. <br /> <br />Ms. McKeehan said that one of the options was a potential black box theater. <br /> <br />Pleamn~on City Council 7 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />06/19/01 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.