My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN032001
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN032001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
4/13/2001 5:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN032001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Dennis believed Mr. Hahner's concerns about the Land Trust are substantial <br /> and she preferred to continue the whole thing. These are big issues that need to be <br /> discussed and that is an essential part of the whole development. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti was concerned that this will hold up other property owners' plans <br /> for the area. She asked if Council could set aside that part and approve the rest. <br /> <br /> Ms McKeehan preferred to set aside the easement and allow staffto have further <br />discussions with Mr. Hahner. If an agreement could not be reached, then the issue will <br />come back before Council. In the meantime Delco Builders must consider what these <br />changes may mean to them. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell asked what recourse Mr. Hahner had if the ordinance is approved. <br /> Ms. McKeehan said ultimately he is still in control of his property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico believed Council approved the Land Trust as third party beneficiary, but <br />did not approve specific language for the easement. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said Council approved the form of the easement, subject to approval of <br />the easement by Mr. Hahner and his attorney. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the Land Trust were still a part of the easement and the <br />language changed, would it take a PUD modification or does the prior approval still <br />stand. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said staff does not know until it reviews the language. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Ayala, seconded by Mr. Campbell, that the following <br />actions be taken: <br /> <br />a. Approve the City Council Minutes for March 6, 200i. <br /> <br />b. Action of the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission. (IR 01:010) <br /> No action was required or taken on this item. <br /> <br />c. Approve Cost Reimbursement Agreement with Safeway, Inc. for Canyon Way / <br /> Foothill Road Phase I Improvements and Canyon / Way Stoneridge Mall Road <br /> Traffic Signal; authorize the City Manager to execute subject contract in an <br /> amount not to exceed $62,760. (SR 01:051) <br /> <br />d. Adopt Resolution No. 01-018, approving the Expenditure of State of California <br /> Law Enforcement Technology Grant. (SR 01:058) <br /> <br />e. Approve Reimbursement Agreement with Mardell LLC for the Design and <br /> Installation of a Sanitary Sewer from the rear lot line of Lot 10, Tract 5188 (710 <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 3 03/20/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.