CCMIN020601 - Laserfiche WebLink

whatever can be found, the building can be used as a cellar for storing barrels to justify the investment by Wente. Ms. Ayala believed the County anticipated there would be two reconstructed wineries in this area and she felt the city needed some assurance that this would happen. If only a shell of a building is approved, how does the City know an actual winery will be established? Mr. Wente disagreed that the County required the buildings to be rebuilt. He agreed with Mr. McKeehan's statement that the condition was to either plant all the acreage in grapes or get credit for building the buildings. Wente is willing to rebuild the building. The only zoned use for the area is as a winery function. Wente will use it as a winery function, although in the beginning it will not be a typical open to the public winery. Eventually it will be a separately operated, independent winery with all the public amenities everyone is hoping for. He reiterated his belief that the County was approving zoning for operating a winery, not legislating the business to exist. Ms. Michelotti clarified that Mr. Wente has plans to move forward with construction of the building at the end of the palm tree lane, and is asking Council not to mandate that a wine tasting operation take place in the building. She understood that in the next one to five years it may be operational. In the meantime, the building can be used by Wente and will have the ambiance and appearance of the winery being reconstructed on site. Ms. Dennis believed a statement had been made that Wente would own and operate the winery. There are many functions of a winery and not all wineries have tasting rooms. Mr. Wente agreed. In Napa Valley, no more tasting room permits are being allowed, but there are wine storage facilities being allowed to be built. Mr. Dennis felt that mere wine storage doesn't make a winery either. She asked what else could be done on this property other than storage and without a tasting room that would make it more functional? Mr. Wente said it is a question of semantics. At the time of the County approval, he wanted to make certain that the zoning allowed the existence of wineries. He was certain there was a potential for those sites. It was uncertain Fenestra would be able to continue in business; fortunately it has. He assured Council they would make the site ready for a winery in the instance that the market justifies that business. Ms. Dennis asked why Wente products could not be made available at that site. Mr. Wente said federal law allows a winery to have only two tasting rooms under its federal winery permit and Wente already has two tasting rooms. Pleasanton City Council 11 02/06/01 Minutes