CCMIN021500 - Laserfiche WebLink

taxes over the next thirty years and $50 million is just the tip of the iceberg. He expressed concerns about required infrastructure and the use of City staff time. In his opinion, the private sector could do a better job in providing the facilities the City would like on the property. He was also concerned about concessions that might be given to potential bidders. He referred to the Task Fome recommendation for affordable or entry- level homes on the site, and did not think it was feasible due to the mount of development fees that are imposed. He was upset that Council had been working on this for six to eight years and had not addressed the issues surrounding a possible purchase of the property by the City. He then related projects the City has started and not yet completed with costs continuing to escalate: LAVWMA pipeline, Tri-Valley Transportation (Highway 84 and BART), the golf course, West Las Positas Interchange, and a sports park that has been moved from site to site with no final location selected. Ms. Ayala was surprised that all the presentations by staff did not answer Mr. Finch' s questions regarding infrastructure. Jan Batcheller, 644 St. Mary Street, acknowledged that there were good points on both sides of Measure I, but she could not support it. The $50 million bond measure, which is actually $128 million with interest over thirty years, is for the purchase of the land, but there is no assurance there will be funds available to construct the items recommended by the Task Force. She opposed any new tax because the significant taxes already being paid need to be more wisely spent. The costs of the LAVWMA pipeline continue to escalate as well as the costs of the proposed golf course because of the length of time both projects take to be resolved. She felt the bond ballot language was incomplete. There are no guarantees or assurances that the residents can direct how the money will be spent. The same situation has arisen with Measure B funds. Finally, she believed this would make the jobs/housing balance even further out of sync. Transportation problems are caused by the large jobs/housing imbalance in Santa Clara County. She felt this would further exacerbate the traffic problems. She urged citizens to vote no on Measure I. Gerry Branken, 1753 Paseo del Cajon, also opposed Measure I. It was disappointing that the bond measure was rushed to the ballot without allowing sufficient time for the opposition to get organized. He has followed the work of the Task Force and applauded its efforts. However, since the final recommendations were just presented tonight, there is not much time for meaningful review and debate before the election. He believed there were two plans for the Bemal Avenue property and was upset the public is only allowed to vote for one, which is only conceptual. He supported the Specific Plan, which was formulated after more than a decade of negotiation and had been reviewed by three Commissions. If the 70 acres of private development (which is shown in both proposals) is removed, the 1998 Specific Plan outlines 85 acres of parks and open space and 153 acres for a long-needed golf facility. This amounts to 60% of open space and 40% for residential. After the hundreds of hours of staffwork and $600,000 in consultants' fees, the plan will be invalidated by Measure I. He felt few voters had ever looked at the plan to see that it is reasonable and feasible. He believed there were more jobs available in town than residents to fill them. People who work here cannot live here Pleasanton City Council 8 02/15/00 Minutes