Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Councilman Beratlis that Ordi. r,~anc:c~ :".._, 6!0, a?proving <br />Annexation Ilo. 65, be introcluced. <br /> <br />The riotion died for lack of a second ~o it and ~%aUc.r Rcic] declared that <br />the proposed Annexation No. 65, had been defeated. <br /> <br />Agpeal of Morrison Iiomes, 470 27th Street, Oakland, fL-om an adverse decision <br />of the Planning Commission in denyiRa an ar~p!icaticn f,gr ariDroyal of a tenta- <br />live Planned Unit Development, under the appro~ria'z,o Sections of Ordinance <br />No. 520, for that property located east of Santa l~;;~ i~oacl, south of Mohr <br />Avenue and ~,rest of the Southern Pa~'l'{3l!road rm_cht-of-~.fa},, and containz' <br />inl ap. pr2Ximatetyj! <br /> <br />Mayor Reid requested that this matter be continued on Se:?tember 8, 1970, in <br />order to allo~-r the City Council, the Plannin{r Conc:~issi. or~ and the City Staff <br />sufficient time to hold a joint study session to discuss the question of <br />density. <br /> <br />Mayor Reid further requested that the staff prepare a report on existing <br />densities in developed, cor,mitted, and undeve!opeJ2 land both within the <br />City and within the General Plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Reid also asked that each Commissioner and Council ~ember prepare a <br />written statement reaardinc the fo!lo~,~ing ~natters: <br /> <br /> 1. Should the City of Ple~santon absolutely a=!-~?~.;~re to the 4.7 average <br /> density figure? <br /> <br /> 2. Should the 4.7 density be maintained steadi~y as the City grows or <br /> should it be used only as the City's ultimate goal? <br /> <br /> 3. Are the planning sectors used by the City ~eanin~ful for counting <br /> density and if so, should the differenh sec'ters be allowed to have <br /> different densities? <br /> <br />Mayor Reid directed the' City Staff to set a date for the aforementioned <br />study session sometime betueen-now and September 8, 1970. <br /> <br />~?[~lication to rezone from the Commercial Free~.xaV ~istrict to the Commercial <br />Service District, that orooertv described as a De~'~_5. On Of Parcel 8-2, Block <br />3370, Book '946 of the Alameda'County Assessor's Oj]i]ice, said parcel contain- <br />inc~ approximately .57 acres and cenerally located '~-cst o-f Santa Rita Road <br />bet~,oeu the Arroyo del Va!le and the I~estern PacifT=c <br /> <br />,",m~:~' Reid declared the public hearinc~ o~en <br /> <br />M~. Castro presented maps of the area and revieued the report of the Planning <br />Co~u-=~ission; dated July 30, 1970, which recommended approval of the requested <br /> <br />"]=~?_~'~L heine no pub]ic protest, it ~cas=movcd l~u Cou.~cii~n ~eratlis and <br />.~.~cended by Councilman Spiliotopou!os that the ~'~,u]~lic hearinc~ be closed. <br /> <br />The ro]! call vote uas as follo~.xs: <br /> <br />i-"~Ti~S: C~uncihnem i~erat]].s, Gerton, Pearson, Sr~]liote?c~u]os and t~ayor Reid <br />ll~OEE: Ngne <br />~ !=.S%.liT: /19Re <br /> <br />'.~isc=~=ssion ensue$~ rcgardi~g the use of the suLjec[r 7roDertl; as a possible <br />site for a veterinarian office. <br /> <br /> 3. 8-17-70 <br /> <br /> <br />