CCMIN103072 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Councilman Mori, and seconded by Councilman- tterlihy that Ordinance No. 682, approving the application of the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton to amend the existing zoning for that property bounded on the north by Interstate Highway #580, on the east by Interstate Highway #680, on the south by Stone- ridge Drive and on the west by Foothill Road. Said property and proposed amendments described more precisely as follows: To the P.U.D. Multiple District those parcels defined as follows: Portion of 941-1201-12-3, Portion of 941-1201-10, Portion of 941-1201-5, Portion of 941-1201-2, 941-1201-3, 941-1201-4,941-1201-11, said parcels containing more or less 97.645 acres, with the following two understandings attached: 1. The school site problem must be resolved 2. The City Council makes not commitment to a residential plan, density or units, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen,Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilman Herlihy, and seconded by Councilman Kinney, that Resolution No. 72-182, upholding the decision of the Planning Commission in denying the application of Willow-West Proper- ties regarding COmmercial zoning on their application for Regional Shopping Center, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: ~YES: l_~ CoUncilmen Iterlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT: None Application of the Planning Commission to amend Title II, Article 2, Section 2-~.38 of the Ordinance Code o'f the City of Pleasanton to p~'~mi~ ~he use of a barbershop as a condi'tional use in the 0 (Office) District I · This matter was continued to the meeting of November 6, 1972. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION City Council Discussion Re: November Propositions After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Pearson and seconded by Councilman Mori, that Resolution No. 72-183, supporting the League of California Cities position on the November'Ballot Propositions, and also taking a YES stand on Proposition 2, and excluding Proposition 18, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: .... ~ouncilmen Heriihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilman Mori, and seconded by Councilman Herlihy, that Resolution No. 72-184, supporting PropoSition 18 be adopted. The roll. call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, and Mayor Reid NOES: Councilman Pearson ABSENT: None Councilman Pearson stated his reason for opposing Proposition 18 is because he felt it was useless to try to legislate morals by any City. SPECIAL REPORTS Presenta~ionby Associated Home Builders of the Greater Eastbay, Inc., Re: Form~iati~n of Regional Growth Poli.cy -7- 10/30/72