CCMIN110573 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Councilman Herlihy, and seconded by Councilman Reid, that the public hearing be closed. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Mori, Reid, and Mayor Pearson NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Kinney Councilman Reid stated he felt the Heritage Tree Ordinance had been adopted in - order to preserve trees in the City of Pleasanton and that it should be adhered to. He further stated he was opposed to the removal of this number of trees in one loca- tion. It was moved by Councilman Mori, and seconded by Councilman Herlihy, that Resolution No. 73-170, approving the application from Valley Bank for authorization to remove six Heritage Trees on private property at 249 Main Street plus two trees from the Bernal Avenue street Right-of-Way in conjunction with development of a banking facility at this location, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Mori, and Mayor Pearson NOES: Councilman Reid ~-~ ABSENT: Councilman Kinney ~ MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION C.) Adoption of Ordinance No. 713~ to rezone from the O (Office) District to the P.U.D. ~.~ (Planned Unit Development) Distric.~ .that property of ~ico Investors~ Inc.~ described as Book 946~ Pa~e 2549~ Parcels 1~ 2 and 3~ said property located south of Palomino Drive between Concord Avenue and Pico..Avenue~ containin~ 2.06 acres~ more or less~ Pleasanton (This ordinance was introduced 10-8-73 by a 3-2 vote) Mayor Pearson declared this item continued to the meeting of November 12, 1973, when a full Council will be present. SPECIAL REPORTS Further Consideration of Co~pproval for the Development of the Stoneridge Shopping Center Mayor Pearson declared this matter continued to the meeting of November 12, 1973, for compilation of reports and alternate means of financing. City Council Review~ Re: Refuse Transfer Station on Vineyard Avenue Mr. Edgar stated that this matter had been reviewed and endorsed by the City Council in April, 1971. He further stated that a number of things had happened since that time, such as the Kaiser Dump Site proposal, which made it impossible for the Pleasanton Garbage Company to go ahead with their plans. Mr. Edgar stated that since the present dump site is expected to be filled to capacity within one year, Pleasanton Garbage Company is again considering submitting their application to Alameda County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for construction of a transfer station in order to continue solid waste disposal service in the City of Pleasanton, and they are requesting City Council endorsement of this concept. Mr. Joe Schwab, Attorney, representing Pleasanton Garbage Company reviewed the concept of the transfer station. He stated there were three alternatives as fol- lows: (1) Another site; (2) Contract with an outside scavanger company; and (3) Create a transfer station. He further stated that Alternate3 was the most feasible, would utilize the present dump site, and be more convenient to the residents o£ the City. He requested City Council endorsement of the concept of a transfer station in order to handle the solid waste disposal problem. Councilman Reid asked if the Pleasanton Garbage Company would be favorable to a joint partnership with the City for recycling services on a contractual basis. Mr. Schwab stated that the Pleasanton Garbage Company had always cooperated with the City on any effort of betterment for the community and he felt sure they would cooperate on this matter if it was feasible. Councilman Reid stated that after much study and review of the Solid Waste disposal problem, he felt the transfer station was a good solution for the City of Pleasanton. 2. 1.~/5/73