CCMIN042875 - Laserfiche WebLink

359' PUBLIC HEARINGS There were no Public Hearings presented at this meeting. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Report of the Plannin~ Commission~ Re: Application from Richard Burke for a revision to PUD-73-2~ to allow the addition of a second floor to a commercial buildinM now under construction; said..,commelr. cial buildin~ is located on the north side of Valley Avenue approximately 590 feet west of Santa Rita Road~ Pleasanton; zonin~ for the property being C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) District Public Hearing.~.. Re: Appeal of Richard Burke from an adverse decision of the Plannin~ Commissio.~ in denying application for a conditional use permit to allow the expansion of a commercial buildinM located on the north side of Valley Avenue approximately 590 feet west of Santa Rite Road~ for the purpose of accommodatin~ office uses; zonin~ for the property is C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) District (Continued Open from 12-16-74~ 2-24-75~ and 3-10-75) Mr~ Harris presented the staff reports dated April 22, 1975, regarding these two itemso Mr~ jack Bras, Attorney representing Richard Burge, presented background informa- tion regarding the applications and displayed maps showing proximity of building to the residential area, and the shadow casting on the adjacent propertyo Councilwoman LeClaire expressed concern regarding office space going begging in the downtown core if mote office space is made available in neighborhood areas. Councilman Herlihy stated he supported development of this particular property but felt the PUD should have been approved in total to uphold the City's policy in approving PUD's. He further stated the Council has a responsibility to the down- town areas Councilman Philcox stated he was in favor of the application because a second story would enhance the building, would increase commercial development especially since sewer capacity is available, and the cost of construction dictates going to two-level buildings. Councilman McLain stated the intention of a PUD is to allow flexibility, and he felt this project is compatible with the neighborhood. Mayo~ KInney stated the property has a long history of development, and that this commercial growth should be encouraged. It was moved by Councilman Philcox, and seconded by Councilman McLain, that Ordinance No. 760, approving a revision to PUD-73-2, to allow the addition of a second floor to a commercial building now under construction; said commercial building is located on the north side of Valley Avenue approximately 590 feet west of Santa Rita Road, Pleasanton; zoning for the property being C-N (Commer- cial Neighborhood) District, subject to the following seven conditions: (1) That the revision be exactly as shown on the site plan and elevations, Exhibit A, on file with the Planning Department and that approval of this revision in no way be construed to indicate approval of any other revision to the final approved plan for PUD-73-2; (2) That the revisions shall be subject to all applicable con- ditions of Ordinance No. 719 under which PUD-73-2 was approved and which is included here by zeference; (3) That approval of this revision is subject to the approval of UP-74-22 by the City; (4) That the developer be reminded that sanitary sewer service is not available to service the second floor addition and that he must apply for and be granted s holding tank to accommodate this expansion before construction can be- gin; (5) That the western elevation of the proposed addition be redesigned to modify' or eliminate the windows shown and that this revised elevation. be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit; (6) That all offices and store spaces in building number 4 be provided with burglar alarm systems and that these systems be approved by the Police Department prior to installation; and (7) That the ice machine in front of the 7-11 Store be removed or effectively screened from public view, be introduced~ 4/28/75