My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN022477
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
CCMIN022477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:48:16 AM
Creation date
11/15/1999 11:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Mercer stated that he felt that he needed more information <br />in order to make a proper judgement on a course of action. He felt that he <br />could commit himself to a November election but he would rather defer any <br />action on a pay-as-you-go plan until information was made available regard- <br />ing the cost of the project, how this cost would apply to Pleasanton resi- <br />dents, environmental impacts, and similar information. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes felt that Options A and B were not feasible but <br />that he was not prepared to commit himself to a pay-as-you-go plan at this <br />time. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Herlihy stated that the specifics of the project were not <br />as important as making the determination as to whether or not LA~{A should <br />accomplish the project with or without voter approval <br /> <br /> Councilmember LeCiaire asked questions related to the timing of the pro- <br />ject and the deadlines of the State, and stated that she felt that Option C <br />was the only possible alternative that would enable all the studies to be <br />accomplished while at the same time preserving the State Grant. <br /> <br /> After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilmember LeCtaire, <br />and seconded by Counci!m~mber Brandes, that Resolution No. 77-47, endorsing <br />Option C in the LAVk,~MA staff report with the following conditions: <br /> <br /> 1. That industrial capacity of approximately one million ga].!ons be <br /> <br /> 3. That the City Council express a willingness to approve appropriate <br /> amendments to the Joint Powers Agreement that are necessary in order <br /> to implement the selected project; <br /> 4.The City Council expressed their preference for a high degree of <br /> reclamation in the selected project; <br />be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Herlihy, LeClaire, Mercer, and Mayor Philcox <br />~iOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION <br /> I.~yor Philcox recessed the meeting to an Executive Session at 6:25 P.M., <br />to discuss pending litigation regarding Withers' claim for defense costs. <br /> <br /> Mayor Philcox reconvened the meeting at 6:35 P.M. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember <br />Mercer, that Resolution No. 77-48, authorizing reimbursement for certain <br />expenses to George Withers related to his Personnel Hearing as follows: <br /> <br /> Attorney Fees $3,306.84 <br /> Supoena Witness 105.00 <br /> Total .$3.,141.84 <br />be adopted. <br /> <br /> 2. 2/24/77 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.