CCMIN112878 - Laserfiche WebLink

339 78-21 Elliott~..!.~c. - Vint.age Hills Commons ~. Harry Elliott, Jr., stated he agreed to the staff report dated November 8, but did not concur with the options listed in staff's report dated November 29. After discussion during which it was noted that construction of this project was conditioned upon the development of the adjacent shopping center, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Project 78-21 Elliott, Inc. - Vintage Hills Commons, be awarded 1 point for Total Air Quality for being near a grocery store, instead of 0 points as recommended by staff. The.roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes, Butler, and Kephart NOES: Councilman Wood and Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None 78-~2 Stoneson Development Corp. - Tr 3150 . Mr. Ted Fairfield, representing Stoneson Development Corp., stated his client had no objection to the point allocation. He stated he felt the RAP point allo- cation was unfair in not allowing consideration for previous improvements made by developers and that this was a flaw in the RAP process. Councilmember Brandes stated he would welcome any ~,~itten comments from developers and encouraged the developers to do this. Mr. Fairfield also requested a better definition of the term pro~ect . Council made no change on the point allocation for Project 78-22 Stoneson Development Corp. - Tr. 3150, as recommended by staff. 78-23 E4P Assoc. - Norton and Palomino Mr. Vince Frevola, partner, stated he had no major objection to the point allocation but felt this project should receive some benefit from the proposed shopping center in the area. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by COuncil- member Brandes, that Project 78-23 FMP Assoc. - Norton and Palomino, be awarded 1 point for Total Air Quality. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes and Wood ~!OES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, and M~yor Mercer ABSENT: None 78-24 Morrison Homes - Tr. 3344 Mr. Bob Miller stated Morrison Homes had no objections to the points awarded for this project. Council made no changes in the point allocation for Project 78-24 Morrison Homes - Tr. 3344, as recommended by staff. 78-25 Kismet Constr. Inc. - Sonoma Drive Mr. Manny Serrano, partner, stated he had no objections to the points awarded for this project. Council asked Mr. Serrano if he would provide for Subsidized Housing. He stated that he would not do so since the project would be "for sale" units rather than the apartments originally proposed. Because of this statement, Council reduced the 5 points awarded under Provision of Subsidized Housing to 0. Council further agreed to the staff's adjusted Design points found in the November 28th report. 3. 11/28/78