My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012280
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
CCMIN012280
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:51:51 AM
Creation date
11/10/1999 11:52:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.7.9-11 Pondero.sa Homes..~ Tract 4432 <br /> ~It was moved by Mayor Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that 79-11 <br /> Ponderosa Homes, Tract 4432, be awarded a total of 87 points, as shown in the staff <br /> recommendation plus an additional 4 points for Design, and 3 points for Traffic Cir- <br /> culation. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSEnt: None <br /> <br /> 79-12 Vintage Hills Ltd., Tract 3187 <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and 'seconded by Councilmember Butler, that <br /> 79-12 Vintage Hills Limited, Tract 3187, be awarded a total of 51 points, as shown in <br /> the staff recommendation. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 79-13 Centex Homes~ PUD-79-11 <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- <br />member Butler, that 79-13 Centex Homes, PUD-79-11, be awarded a total of 69 points, <br />as shown in the staff recommendation plus 1 additional point for Design and 1 addi- <br />tional point for Other Environmental Considerations. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, and Mercer <br />NOES: Councilman Wood and Mayor Brandes <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> ~yor Brandes stated he favored this project receiving 68 points. <br /> <br />79-14 Chamberlain GroupL.PUD-78.-5 <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that <br />79-14 Chamberlain Group, PUD-78-5, be awarded a total of 55 points. <br /> <br /> After discussion concerning In-kind Services category points, Councilmember Kep- <br />hart withdrew his second. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler than seconded the motion for 55 points total, comprised of <br />the staff recommendation points plus an additional 6 points .for In-kind Capital <br />Improvements (3 additional points for park fill material and 3 points for the dif- <br />ferential in costs between the pump facility currently proposed and those water <br />facilities necessary solely to serve the project). <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: Councilman Kephart <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />79-16 Amador Valley Inv.,.Tra.ct 3148 <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Mayor Brandes, that ~9-16 <br />Amador Valley Investors, Tract 3148, be awarded a total of 58 points as shown in the <br />staff recommendation plus an additional 2 points for Design and 1 point for Traffic <br />Circulation. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 8. 1/22/80 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.