CCMIN011480 - Laserfiche WebLink

MIN'UTES of THE MEETING of THE CITY COUNCIL January 14, 1980 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Frank Brandes, Jr., called the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Deputy City Clerk Doris George called the roll which is recorded as follows: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes were present. Mr. Brown, City Manager, Mr. Walker, Assistant City Manager, Mr. Levine, City Attorney, Mr. Campbell, Director of Public Works and Utilities, Mr. Harris, Director of Plan- ning and Community Development, and Mr. Swift, Assistant Planner, were present. AGENDA AMENDMENTS Mr. Brown requested that an Executive Session be held at the conclusion of this meeting to discuss litigation. REVIBJ SESSION - RAP ALLOCATIONS Mayor Brandes stated that the purpose of this meeting was to take public testimony from developers regarding their projects relative to the Residential Allocation Pro- gram allocation, and to allow Council to ask any questions they might have. Mayor Brandes advised that a decision on the RAP allocations would be made by the City Council at their meeting of January 22, 1980. 79-1 Wilson, Tract 3298 Mr. Ted Fairfield, Consulting Civil Engineer representing DeWitt Wilson, stated he felt that RAP is not a fair program but that staff presented a good report under the RAP criteria. Mr. Fairfield stated he felt a project such as this one should score higher but because of lack of sewer capacity it was being ranked lower.-Mr. Fairfield stated he felt McHenry Gate should be considered as a Missing Link, however the question was moot at this time but should be looked at next year. Mr. Fairfield stated that the staff report was in error regarding points for work on the railroad right-of-way. He stated that it has been City policy to require developers of lands adjoining railroads to improve one quadrant of streets crossing the railroad right-of-way, citing just such a requirement of the Singer project Just northerly of this site. Thus, he felt the staff's original recommendation to count the street work in the railroad right-of-way for purposes of determing a major thorough- fare dedication/completion should be accepted by the Council. 79-2 Mission Park Investments~. PUD 77-10 Mr. Ted Fairfield, Consulting Civil Engineer representing Mission Park Investors, presented a map showing the proposed development and traffic circulation. Mr. Fair- field stated that he felt Dolores Drive should be considered as a Missing Link. He stated that as this area developed that Dolores Drive would be used as a through street to reach the school and park. If non-residents would not use the street, the parking area at the end of Dolores Street, as required by Council, would not be necessary. He added that Dolores Drive will ultimately be a key street and should receive points for this under Missing Links.