CCMIN021081 - Laserfiche WebLink

There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the Negative Declaration. Mr. Harris stated the Negative Declaration was based on development of the entire property and that the mitigating Negative Declaration is still appropriate and can be used as long as the mitigating measures are still in effect. Mr. Harris presented the following two conditions which he recommended be added to the conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 1936: 1. That prior to the submittal of improvement plans for the subdivision of the subject property, the developer shall fund (or participate in the funding of) a comprehensive water study of the north Pleasanton area to identify short and long-term improvements necessary to achieve adequate water supply and pressure, and in order to achieve timely completion of such improvements concurrent with the development of the subject site, the developers shall enter into an agreement to pay their appropriate share of the costof the water facilities necessary to serve the subject site, or made necessary due to the cumulative development in the north Pleasanton area. Improvements may be made via reimbursement agreement, assessment districts or benefit district as best meets the needs of the City and developer; 2. Since the subject property will be subdivided and some of the lots event- ually sold, the ordinance or abstract thereof approving case PUD-80-14, shall be recorded so that all future owners are apprised of the obliga- tions attached to the property. Councilmember Butler stated that the key to the potential traffic problems is to require mitigation measures to maintain traffic control in the area in question by requiring whatever reasonable conditions and by whatever methods that are necessary for such control. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 81-31, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the Cityts guidelines if mitigating conditions are adopted, and that a Negative Declaration is appropriate for development plan approval for the 60-acre site located immediately south of Johnson Drive and about 700 feet west of Hopyard Road for the most southeasterly portion of the property, the property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) District, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, and Wood NOES: Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None Mayor Mercer stated that recently the City Council had required an Environmental Impact Report be done on the Fromm Property. He stated he felt the Reynolds and Brown property will have a significant impact on the community and should Be .required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report. He added that although a traffic study had been done in this area there are other concerns that need analysis. Mr. Harris advised Council that Council action includes consideration of the precise details of development of the 13 lots shown with building footprints, and the two streets. The remainder of the property, shownby use designations only, will have to submit precise information before they can be developed. lo. 2/10/81