CCMIN012781 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Peter Googins, 511 Mission Street, representing ROAR (Residents Organized for Alternate Routing), stated he felt Livermore was pushing the bounds of neighbor- hood, that the adoption of this ordinance had already been delayed many times, and he urged Council to adopt the ordinance without any further delay. Councilmember Butler stated he felt a strong sense of obligation to honor the request of the City of Livermore, but would not favor postponing adoption of this ordinance for another 30 days. He stated his position is that Council has been through this thing so many times he did not feel any other action would accomplish anything. Councilmember Kephart stated that Council is elected by the people and he has to do what he feels is best for the City of Pleasanton. Mayor Mercer stated he would have supported granting a 30 day delay as requested by the City of Livermore, as he felt they may not have realized before now the im- pacts this ordinance will have on them, however, he would be voting for adoption of the ordinance. It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Ordinance No. 954, amending Title V (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 5 (Commercial Vehicle Regulation) by adding Article 2 to prohibit overweight vehicles from cer- tain roads, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT:. None Adoption of Ordinance No. 956~ amending Section ~F5.38~ Article 3~ ~hapter. 2.~.. Title II of the' Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton to chanMe the rear yard setback and open .space requirements for the R-1-6500, R-i-ZS00~ R-1-8509~ and RM-4000 resi- dential districts .(Intro. 1-13-81~ 4~Ayes, 1-Abse.nt) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 956 was introduced on January 13, ~981, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent, and it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Ordinance No. 956, amending Subsection 2-5.38(e) (side and rear yards: requirements and exceptions), Article 3 (site, yard, bulk, usable open space and screening and landscaping regulations), Chapter 2 (Zoning),Title II (Zoning and Development) of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton regarding rear yard setback, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Adoption of Ordinance No. 957~ approvin~ the application of the plannin~ Commission of the City of Pleasanton to zone a port~o~ of the recently annexed proper.ty in- cluded in Annexation 78 consistinM of approximately 127 acres located east of the extension of Valley Avenue between Bernal Avenue and the Arroyo Del. Valle to the R-1-6500~. R-1-7500~ R-1-8500~ R-i-10,000~ R-i-20,000 and the Public and ~nstitu- tional District or any other zonin~ district consistent with the General Plan (Intro. 1-13-81, ~-Ay~s,.1LAbsen~) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No~ 957 was introduced on January 13, 1981, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent, and it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. 7o 1/27/81