CCMIN111081 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. The following persons spoke in opposition to this item: Mr. Jim Wall, 3437 Vineyard Avenue, stated he was opposed to this project because of the increased traffic that will be generated in front of his property. He stated he did not feel that residents in the area had been properly notified. He requested that the item be continued to allow property owners in this area to fully review the plans. He stated many of his neighbors are opposed to the extension of Pico Avenue. Mrs. Barbara Earl, 3263 Vineyard Avenue, stated that residents of the mobile home park had not been notified of this public hearing, and she requested the item be con- tinued so they would have time to study the plans. Mr. Jeff Rodgets, 3727 Vine.Street, stated he purchased his home because of the rural atmosphere of the area, and he was opposed to any improvement that would change this lifestyle. Mr. G. L. Goudreau, 5451 Corte Paloma~ stated he was opposed to this item because of traffic impacts. After discussion, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing continued Open on the plans relating to the extension of Pico Avenue between Vineyard Avenue and the Del Valle Parkway, consisting of the construction of a two-lane thoroughfare and bridge over the Arroyo Del Valle, the installation of a 12" water line within the corres- ponding right-of-way, and the extension of the Del Valle Parkway roadway connection, and accompanying negative declaration, to the meeting of November 24, 1981, 8:00 P.M~, Fairgrounds Cafeteria. He instructed staff to meet with residents in the area of Pico and Vineyard in order to fully inform them of the plans for the extension of Pico Avenue. Mayor Mercer recessed the meeting at 10:00 P.M. Mayor Mercer reconvened the meeting at 10:10 P.M. Appeal of Valley Business Associates of a decision of the Plannin~ Commission denying a major modification to Case PUD-80-1 to change the streets in the business park proposed for the 69 acre site located south of Valley. Avenue and east of the resi~' dences on Kolln Street from private to p~blic Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item, and continued it the meeting of December 8~ 1981, 8:00 P.M.~ Fairgrounds Cafeteria, at the request of the appellant. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Adoption of Ordinance No. !005~ a~proving the application of Har__.~and }~e!yn R. Hempy and Robert and Margaret Starnes to fezone an approximately 9 acre area on the west side of Foothill Road~ north qf Highland Oaks Drive in the vicinitX of 5050 and 5100 Foothill Road from the "A" (A~ricul~ure) ~0 the R-lr4~OO0 (Single-Family Resi- dential) District (Intro. 10-27~8~,.4-Ay~s, i-No) .... Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 1005 was introduced on October 27, 1981, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-No, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. It ~as moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Ordinance No. 1005, approving the application of'Harry and Evelyn R. Hempy and Robert and Margaret Starnes to fezone an approximately 9 acre area on the west side of Foot- hill Road, north of Highland Oaks Drive in the vicinity of 5050 and 5100 Foothill Road 8. 11/10/81