CCMIN111081 - Laserfiche WebLink

25: Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. Lynn McVicor, representing Stoneson Associates, stated his company has attempted to mitigate all the areas of concern relative to noise, parking and landscaping. Mr. Bill Christensen, 7979 Hillsboro Court, representing Stoneridge Homeowners Association, asked questions regarding the interchange. He stated he was opposed to the proposed project because he felt that High Density Residential zoning is not con- sistent with the area and he would prefer that it be zoned Medium Density Residential. Mr. McVicor rebutted by stating that affordable housing is planned for this pro- perty and the higher density is required to accommodate the development. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Resolution No. 81-390, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a mitigated negative declaration is appro- priate for a general plan amendment to change the land use designation of an approxi- mately 6.6 acre site located on Stonedale Drive, between Stoneridge Drive on the north and 1-680 on the east from Freeway Interchange and Open Space (Public Health and Safety) to High Density Residential, be adopted. The roll call vote was as f~llows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart,-MOhr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Resolution No. 81-389, approving the application of Stoneson Associates for a general plan amendment to change the land usedesignation of an approximately 6.6 acre site located on Stonedale Drive, between Stoneridge Drive on the north and 1-680 on the east from Freeway Interchange and Open Space (Public Health and Safety) to High Den- sity Residential. subject to conditions set forth in staff report SR 81:395. but de- leting Condition No. 4 relative to entering an assessment district for traffic impacts. be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Plans relating to the extension of Pico Avenue between Vineyard Avenue and the Del Valle Parkway, consistin~ of the construction of a two-lane thoroughfare and bridg~ over the ArrOyo Del Valle, the installation of a 12" water line within the corres- po'nding right-of-way~ apd the Lex,~ension of the Del Valle Parkway roadway connection On the basis ~f an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the pro- Ject, the Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would ~ot have .any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that a draft Negative Declaration of environmental impacts be pre- pared. The environmental document and information relatin~ to the project are available for review and comment at the EnRineering/Public Works Department or Plannin8 Division,, City Hal!~ 200 Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton. Comments may be sub- mitted prior to the above meeting or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meetin8 Mr. Warnick presented his report (SR 81:390) dated November 4, 1981, regarding this matter. 7. 11/10/81