CCMIN101381 - Laserfiche WebLink

145 Mr. Larry Mayor asked why industrial zoning was being requested. Mr. Harris explained that the property is now in the county, and that the county requires property being annexed to the city to be prezoned. The General Plan shows all of this area as being industrial, including the subject property. For that reason and because zoning has to be in conformance with the General Plan when annexation is requested, prozoning is required. Mayor Mercer reviewed the annexation proce- dure. Mr. Steve Hughes, 587 Touriga Court, stated he felt the people in the area should want annexation in order that the improvements would be under control of ~he city, and that they should ask for whatever zoning they desired. Ms. Marsha Davis, Meadow View area, stated there has been a lack of information regarding this item. She stated she had grave concerns about Pimlico Drive. Mayor Mercer requested that Ms. Davis be sent a notice regarding any items of interest in her area. Ms. Janice Markoff, Pleasanton Meadows, stated she was gratified with the turn- out of Pleasanton Meadows residents to this meeting on such short notice. She stated that it is inconceivable that this zoning would be proposed to go Fast a school. She stated she did not want any industrial use on West Las Posita~ Boule- vard, and requested that this property be zoned residential. Mr. Jerry Lugar stated that the General Plan designation seems to be tie issue in question. He asked about access on E1 Charro Road when this road has nst been completed and is privately owned. He stated he feared that West Las Positas Boule- vard would be used until such time as E1 CharTO could be built. Mr. Harris advised that E1Charro Road is the ultimate intended access route. Ms. Carol Legorion asked how E1 Charro Road can be considered for improvement since it is privately owned. She reiterated her position that she does not want West Las Positas Boulevard to be used as a truck route. Ms. Langendorf, Pleasanton Meadows, stated she is opposed to industrial zoning but would favor agricultural zoning. Mr. Roger Allen, Pleasanton Meadowss stated that if there are no plans =o develop the property then he felt it should be zoned agricultural. The following persons telephoned City Hall on October 13, 1981, expressing oppo- sition to this item: Chuck Sickles, 3925 West Las Positas Josephine Fogarty, 3710 Oakbrook Court There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- member Mohr, that Resolution No. 81-344, to send the application of the City of Pleasanton to prozone (Annexation No. 83) an approximately 25 acres located on the north side of the Arroyo Mocho immediately easterly of and adjacent to the present City limit line approximately 2,000 feet west of E1 Charro Road roan Industrial zoning, back to ~he Planning Commission for their report on the proposal to fezone it to the "A" (A~ricultural) District, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Wood ABSENT: None 6. 10/13/81 ...........