CCMIN060882 - Laserfiche WebLink

131 Hopyard Road soundwall and landscape, medians, and public service easements; entrance into project; Section B - central spine to inner loop; Section C - central spine; intersection of Hopyard Road and West Las Positas plaza; Section D - inner loop; Section E - West Las Positas, east-west Las Positas road; Section F - local streets with 33' public service easement; Santa Rita Road soundwall; signing and lighting; maintenance responsibility legend, stating there will be no public expense; overall project and design guidelines with CC&R's; street design; public service easements of 50' and 33' setbacks; typical corner site; handicap ramp and typical parking space. Mr. Callahan stated that all regulations and conditions will be enforced by deed restrictions as well as the PUD ordinance and design guidelines. He stated that a homeowners association is being formed with a full-time employee to enforce regula- tions and restrictions. He reviewed the CC&R's and stated the City also has control. Mr. Callaban continued the slide presentation as follows: illustrative plan of Site 1 commercial showing mixed use of commercial and general office; prospective of project in Spanish style; aerial prospective of 2-3 story office buildings; birdseye prospective of 2-3 story office building; site plan at southeast corner of Hopyard Road and Inglewood showing 2-3 story.general office use buildings; birdseye prospec- tive of 2-3 story general office use buildings; site plan of proposed midrise office project; aerial prospective of midrise office project; typical 2 story office and research development project and site plan; site plan for general use warehouse pro- ject; elevation of general use warehouse project; impacts and mitigation measures relative to flood, noise, traffic, and air quality; assessment district for the North Pleasanton area; and fiscal impact analysis for next ten years. Mr. Callahan con- cluded his presentation by stating that it is his objective to propose the best pos-I sible quality development which will be an asset to the City of Pleasanton. Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open. The following persons spoke in favor of the items: Mr. John Innes, 1586 Foothill Road, stated that Mr. Callahan's project is one of the finest industrial projects he has ever seen in his working career as one who rents property of this type. He stated the type of buildings and the conditions imposed bY Mr. Callahan himself as well as the City will bring the type of development and growth to the City of Pleasanton which is necessary to go into the year 2000. Mr. Innes stated he had some reservations regarding the total development of the North Pleasan- ton property and its effect on the community. He stated there is need for an overall plan for North Pleasanton and the area effected by its influence. He stated the con- ditions imposed on the Hacienda Business Park are good and that these conditions are needed on every business project that will come to Pleasanton so that each will be beneficial to Pleasanton. Mr. Innes requested that Council consider the establishment of a General Plan Review Committee to review the General Plan of Pleasanton, parti- cularly industrial land as designated on the General Plan. He stated this committee could be implemented by Council selecting a reasonable number of people (8-12) as a steering committee which would be representative of the community as a balance of all views; and that the City Council from this group select two co-chairpersons represent- ing the divergent views of the community so that all concerns will be addressed. The steering committee would be charged with undertaking, over a reasonable period of time, a proper evaluation of traffic, water, air quality, and sewage within the present City limits and sphere of influence, with the scope of the review subject to Council re- view and approval. He asked Council to obtain the services of an independent consult- ing firm who would assist in their work. Once the issues have been refined by the steering committee and sanctioned by the Council, items would then be taken to sub- 5. 6/8/82