CCMIN022382 - Laserfiche WebLink

319 After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- member Kephart, that Resolution No. 82-62, approving the appeal of Valley Business Associates of a decision of the Planning Commission denying a major modification to Case PUD-80-1 to change the streets in the business park proposed for the 69 acre site located south of Valley Avenue and east of the residences on Kolln Street from private to public, with additional conditions, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 82-63, accepting proposal for special assessment proceedings for Valley Business Park Assessment District, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Application of the City of Plea~anton to prezone a 21 acre site at the northeast corner of Trenery Drive and Oakland Avenue to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Medium Density Residential District or any other zonin~ district consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the project.~ .the Director of Plannin8 and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial Study is available for review at the Planning Division, 200 Bernal Avenue~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Planning staff prior to the above meetin~ dater or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meetin~ Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:67) dated February 11, 1982, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the nega- tive declaration. Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, Attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Molinaro, stated they support the staff report. He requested the property be prezoned PUD-Medium Density Residential District. He advised that the adjacent property to the west is zoned high density while the adjoining property to the east is low density-rural type residential; and that the medium density inbetween will be a good transition. He stated that the PUD designation will give the property owner maximum flexibility for the transition. He advised the property will not be developed within the next 2-5 years. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 82-64, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as Cit ' outlined in the y s guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate to prezone a 21 acre site at the northeast corner of Trenery Drive and Oakland Avenue to the PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential District, be adopted. 5. 2/23/82