CCMIN112784 - Laserfiche WebLink

After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Mohr, that Resolution No. 84-602, making application to LAFCO for Annexation No. 111 (Mr. g Mrs. Heinrich, 3683 Vineyard Avenue, Mr. & Mrs. Alves, 3655 Vineyard Avenue and 495 Linden Way, and Mr. g Mrs. Lapsen, 3731 Vineyard Avenue), and requiring that the applications for this annexation have an acceptable legal description and map of the proposed annexation (meeting LAFCO standards) prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor, and that the applicants pay the LAFCO and State processing fees; that Resolution No. 84-603, agreeing to the exchange of property tax revenue in connection with Annexation No. 111; and Resolution No. 84-604, initiating prezoning for Annexation No. 111, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, and Wood NOES: Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None General Plan Update Progress Report Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:616) dated November 27, 1984, regarding this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, after review of the contents of Working Paper ~! contained in Staff Report 84:616, approve the recommended table of contents in Working Paper ~1, Chapter 3, as a preliminary outline for the revised General Plan; approve the recommended goals and policies in Working Paper #1, Chapter 4, for further review during the General Plan Update process; and after review of the contents for Working Paper ~2, direct the General Plan Consul- tant to proceed with developing three General Plan land use alternatives for further review by Council. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Proposal for a Residential General Plan Review Committee Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:632) dated November 27, 1984, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer stated he felt the size of the committee should be unlimited; that the steering committee should be a total number of 7, with one appointment made by each Councilmember and two by the Council in general; and that Council give charges to the committee as to what should be studied. Councilmember Brandes stated he felt there should be a clear definition of the charges. He stated he did not feel that anyone interested in serving on this committee should be excluded, however a committee of 50 or more is awkward. He suggested a steering committee of 11 persons, with Council appointing two members each and the Chairperson appointed by the City Council as a whole. He felt the larger committee should be open to the entire community, including developers. It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that the Steering Committee for the Residential General Plan Review Committee consist of 11 members and that the General Committee be open to the community but that any person missing more than two meetings be dropped from the committee. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, to amend the motion to state that the 11 members of the Steering Committee be comprised by the following method: chairperson of the committee appointed by City Council; applications be taken and each Councilmember be allowed to appoint two members to this committee. 8. 11/27/84