CCMIN101084 - Laserfiche WebLink

245 on an eight acre option for one year, and he felt this is a big change in the intent of the original general plan. It was not something that the General Plan Review specifically focu~on but it was their recommendation that that land be held for hospital. Councilmember Brandes stated he is not concerned about the PUD condition at this time, as the situation has changed since approval of the original application. He stated he had requested the original change because it was uncertain then as to which medidal organization would be developing in the Valley or how much land would be needed. He stated that matter has been clearly identified now, the size is appro- priate for the proposed medical facility, and this warrants removal of the condition. Mr. Innes stated he is concerned about the size of the outlying area and acreage required for support services. He added he did not feel the City should sacrifice land by cutting it down too much. Mr. Greg Doherty, Chairman of the Planning Commission, stated that this item was before Planning Commission at their last meeting, at which time the President of the Board of Directors for the Hospital stated they would probably not have need for addi- tional land. However, Planning Commission felt there should be an option on the surrounding land for a period of time (12 months) in the event it would be needed for support services for the hospital. He stated that Planning Commission did not discuss the concerns voiced by Mrs. Mayhew and Mr. Innes; they only looked at a trade off of land. Mr. Joe Callahan, Callaban Pentz Properties, stated the application is only for a reconfiguration of existing zoning. He stated it would be unreasonable to restruct the use of his parcel based upon whether the neighboring property developed. He ad- vised that with all the information available at this time it is possible the General Plan Review Committee would not have recommended residential use of this land because of certain adverse environmental factors. He stated he has requested removal of Condition No. 3, but agrees to the other conditions, including water and fire assess- ment districts, and that Hospital Board Members concur. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood~ that Resolution No. 84-523, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, it would have a significant adverse effect on the environ- ment but that recommended conditions of approval would reduce this impact to an insig- nificant level and that a mitigated negative declaration is appropriate in connection with GP-84-13 and PUD-84-14, application of Callahan Pentz Properties and Valley Memo- rial Hospital for an amendment to the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan to reconfigure the land use designation and for PUD rezoning to reconfigure the zoning of the approximately 62 acre site located at the northwest corner of Santa Rita Road and West Las Positas Boulevard, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Butler, that Resolution No. 84-527, approving GP-84-13, application of Callahan Pentz Properties and Valley Memorial Hospital for an amendment to the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan to reconfigure the land use designation' of the approximately 62 acre site located at the northwest corner of Santa Rita Road and West Las Positas Boulevard and to show a northwest/southeast trending thoroughare in that area, subject to the following conditions: ll. 10/16/84