CCMIN100284 - Laserfiche WebLink

287 been sent to the Mayor. He stated that subsequently contracts were let but previous engineering problems have caused some delay. Speaking for the Board of Directors and the majority of homeowners, they feel that Stoneson has acted in good faith regarding the roof and siding repair project, and they do not object,to the model homes being opened; traffic has not been a concern of the Board of Directors. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on this item. Councilmember Butler stated that it seems the heart of the issue is the roof repair matter and he has received four calls indicating the homeowners are satisfied with the fact that Stoneson is moving and the matter will be taken care of. Councilmember Mohr stated she would like to have some kind of paving done to make the area more safe for pedestrians. Mayor Mercer stated he felt it is a shame that it took a public hearing on this development to get these problems to a conclusion; the developer should have taken care of this matter on his own without laying the cost on the residents. Mayor Mercer advised he would be voting NO on this item because the neighbors have had to put up with a mess for seven years; he does not approve of Stoneson's actions rela- tive to the repair of the roofs and siding. He added their actions have not been correct. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- member Brandes, that Resolution No. 84-500, denying the appeal of Michael Perkins of a decision of the Planning Commission; and after a review of the traffic report, and making the following findings: (1) that the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the Dis- trict in which the site is located; (2) that the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (3) that the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, thereby approving a conditional use permit to allow the establishment and operation of a subdivision sales office and model home complex in three residential units located at the southeast corner of Springdale Avenue and Stonedale Drive, subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2490, and requiring that a review of traffic be conducted in six months, be adopted. . The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, and Wood NOES: Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None PUD-84-6, Application of the Pleasanton School District and Kenneth Chin for rezoning and development plan approval for a five unit residential development on an approxi- mately .9 acre site, located on the north side of Abbie Street between the Old Towne development and the residences on the east side of Whiting Street. Zoning for the property is R-1-6500 (Single-family Residential) District Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:519) dated September 25, 1984, requesting that this item be continued to November 13, 1984, because Planning Commission will not consider the matter until their meeting of October 10, 1984. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open, and continued the item to the meet- ing of November 13, 1984, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers. 8. 10/2/84