CCMIN091184 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Perkins rebutted by stating the homeowners have previously been assessed for the roof repairs by the Homeowners Association. The repairs were not satis- factory because of incorrect construction of the homes, therefore he felt the money assessed the homeowners should be refunded to them. He advised there has been much interior damage because of the faulty roofing, which should also be the responsi- bility of Stoneson Development Company to reimburse. He stated he felt Council could take this opportunity to find out if Stoneson Development Company is going to stand up to what is morally correct and refund the homeowners and prevent them from opening the model home complex. He stated he has given enough reasons to delay opening until the homeowners have a fair and total settlement for damages to their homes. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. After discussion, it was moved bv Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Butler, that the appeal of Mr. Perkins of a decision of the Planning Commission approving conditional use permit to allow the establishment and operation of a sub- division sales office and model home complex in three residential units located at the southeast corner of Springdale Avenue and Stonedale Drive, be denied. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes and Butler NOES: Councilmembers Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None Councilmember Mohr expressed concern regarding possible traffic problems at this location, and stated she would like to have a report from staff regarding this matter before making a decision on the item. Mr. Perkins stated he was agreeable to a continuance of this item. Mr. Art Schumacher, Stoneson Development Company, stated the matter of the partial settlement and the establishment and operation of a subdivision sales office and model home complex are two different items and should be kept separate. He advised that he does not wish this item continued. He stated that traffic is not a problem, and that there is adequate parking. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmen~ber Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, to reopen the public hearing on the appeal by Michael Perkins of a decision of the Planning Commission approving conditional use permit to allow the establishment and operation of a su]Ddivision sales office and model home complex in three residential units located at the southeast corner of Springdale Avenue and Stonedale Drive, and continue this item to October 2, 1984, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasan- ton Council Chambers, and instructing staff to prepare a report regarding traffic and related safety at this location. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Brandes ABSENT: None AP-84-12, Appeal of Morgan Construction Company of a decision of the Board of Adjust- ment denying a variance to allow a subdivision sales office within 200 feet of an existing residence outside of the subdivision on property located on the east side of Muirwood Drive approximately 500 feet south of its intersection with West Las Positas Blvd. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-High Den- sity Residential District Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:489) dated September 5, 1984, regarding this matter. 7. 9/11/84