CCMIN050884 - Laserfiche WebLink

REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Actions Taken by the Board of Adjustment, De~.ign Review BoarJ., and Planning Commission at their meeting of 4-25-84 Mr. Glenn presented the report of the Director of Planning and Community Development (SR 84:228) dated April 26, 1984, regarding this matter. It was moved by Vice Mayor Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, to appeal the decision of the Design Review Board in approving Z-84-107, the application of Mozart Development Company for design review approval of four commercial/office buildings rang- ing in size from 3 stories, approximately 72,500 sq. ft. to 5 stories, approximately 189,000 sq. ft., and related facilities on approximately 20 acres at the southwest cor- ner of I-SS0 and 1-680, east of Stoneridge Mall Road; and also to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission in approving UP-84-5, application of Ponderosa Homes for a con- ditional use permit for a model home complex, sales office and related facilities on six lots at the intersection of the proposed extensions of Hansen Drive and Paseo Santa Cruz. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Wood, and Vice Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Butler and Mayor Mercer REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER Request for Annexation from Mike Harris, Lawrence Miller a~d Dorothy Miller for approxi- ~.ate~y 6.39 acres on the North side of Vineyard Avenue Vice Mayor Brandes declared this item removed from the agenda at the request of the applicant. ~eport on As~sumption of City Inspection of Mobile Home Parks Responsi.bility Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 84:252) dated May 3, 1984, regarding this matter. Mr. Steve Hughes, 587 Touriga Court, stated he brought this matter before Council approximately three months ago because of a particular instance at the mobile home park for which it was very difficult to get the State to carry out their responsibility re- lative to the problem./-He stated he had several disagreements with ~he staff report and felt the City should take responsibility for inspection of the ~obi!e home parks in Pleasanton. Mr. Hughes presented a ~ritten report on the people he had talked to who are employed by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Develop- ment, and the results of these conversations. Vice Mayor Brandes stated he felt that basically the City could spend 10-12 working days per year inspecting the premises of the mobile home parks, and suggested that if staff is overburdened that additional manpower be added. He stated he strongly feels that the closer the people are to government the sooner their problems will be resolved, and that this is a way the City can serve its residents. Councilmember Wood stated this would form another layer of government and he felt the City should look into whether or not we really have a problem. He added he is in favor of local control if it is cost effective. Councilmember Mohr stated she agrees with Vice Mayor Brandes and is looking for the most effective manner to accomplish this. The City Attorney advised that the City could be liable for negligent inspection if it takes over responsibility of inspection of the mobile home parks. Mr. Curt Stewart, Chief Building Inspector, stated he did not have any building inspectors trained to do mobile home park inspection but this could be done by sending them to State schools for training. He stated that in his previous experience of work- 8. 5/8/84