CCMIN071586 - Laserfiche WebLink

461 trees could be planted around the edges of the sludge ponds to improve its appearance. Mayor Brandes instructed the Sewer Committee to investigate this matter. Mr. Tom Terrill, Reynolds and Brown, 6601 Owens Drive, stated that in the last 24-48 hours there has been a serious problem of noxious fumes from the DSRSD sewer plant that are effecting the Pleasanton Park project. He stated that DSRSD has stated that the District is attending to the problem but it might take up to three weeks to resolve it, which is entirely unacceptable. He urged the City to protect the environment surrounding this area; if the sewer plant does not work efficiently this will create a great problem. He would prefer the City operate the sewer plant. His concern is that the City will be commenting on land that is a non-conforming use and adversely affects surrounding uses within the City boundary. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 86-343, determining that disposal of the General Services Administration surplus property to Dublin San Ramon Ser- vices District and the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency is ap- propriate and is not incompatible with Pleasanton's development plans and pro- grams, however if the need for the property by DSRSD and/or LAVWMA for sewage treatment and disposal ceases, Council would like to have first opportunity to have the property transferred to the ownership of Pleasanton, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Wood REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Approval of Land Exchange Agreement with Zone 7 Mr. MacDonald presented his report (SR 86:297) dated July 10, 1986, regarding this matter. He advised that the Zone 7 agreement is complete but that the agreement with Hopyard Partners has several issues that need to be settled by Council before it can be finalized. Mr. MacDonald set forth the issues that needed to be resolved as follows: (1) who should pay replacement cost of watercourse structure; (2) can Hopyard occupy additional buildings in PUD prior to completion of the parking struc- ture; and (3) can City use Parking Facility Access Easement for access to parking beyond the parking facility. Council discussion ensued between themselves and representatives of the Hopyard Shopping Center regarding these issues. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mer- cer, that completion of the parking structure be required before occupancy of additional buildings is allowed. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mercer, and Mohr NOES: Mayor Brandes ABSENT: Councilmember Wood It was moved by Mayor Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that the City will have the option open for future use of the Parking Facility Access Easement for access to parking beyond the parking facility. The roll call vote was as follows: - 13 - 7-15-86