My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN100786
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
CCMIN100786
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:50:35 AM
Creation date
11/4/1999 11:41:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
139 <br /> Mayor Brandes declared the public hearin9 closed. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mercer stated he felt that service stations are well lit and <br />to allow one more sign to show prices is unreasonable. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, <br />that Ordinance No. 1277, to be read by title only and waiving further reading <br />thereof, approving RZ-86-8, application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the <br />Municipal Code relating to increasing the number of illuminated signs permit- <br />ted for service station uses in the "C" (Commercial) District, be introduced. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: Councilmembers Mercer and Wood <br />ABSENT: None <br />AP-86-10, Appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission denying the applica- <br />tion of Gre~ Eagle for a major modification to an approved develoVment p an to <br />the 28-uni.t residential development the south side of the eastern <br />terminus of Crellin Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit <br />Development)-Low Density Residential District <br /> <br />Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 86:437) dated October 7, 1986, regard- <br />ing this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing open on the application and the <br />negative declaration. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tom Plummer, 29 California Street, representing the appellant, stated <br />they agree with the staff report with the exception of Condition No. 3, which <br />requires that the driveway shall be constructed only after a building permit <br />has been issued for the parcel. He stated the prospective buyer of the parcel <br />can assure that they will proceed to build. <br /> <br /> Mr. Michael O'Callaghan, 4558 Second Street, stated he ha~ met with the <br />prospective buyers and feel they have come to an amiable solution for the <br />development of this property, which will be an attribute to the subdivision. <br />He asked Council to give approval not only to the relocation of the pad but <br />stipulate that they have approval of the grading plan and house location, and <br />that the approval would remain the same for whoever buys and builds on the <br />property. He stated he is in agreement with the remainder of the report. He <br />requested assurance from the Council that the hill would be put back to its <br />former order should mud slides occur; he felt some type of protection agree- <br />ment should be required with the site plan and grading plan. He stated his <br />only concern is if the Black's do not build; he wanted assurance that the <br />house will be built as now expected. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jim Colburn, builder on #18, Grey Eagle, stated he is concerned about <br />the extend of the original grading plan. He stated he can support the plan <br />that is being considered tonight. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated the only issue is the grading and the oppor- <br />tunity to allow some construction to get started before the winter season. He <br />suggested the posting of a maintenance bond to assure that the appropriate <br />grading and erosion control will take place. <br /> <br /> 13 - 10-7-86 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.